Implicit normativity in scientific advice: values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Implicit normativity in scientific advice : values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice. / Folker, Anna Paldam; Andersen, Hanne; Sandøe, Peter.

In: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2008, p. 199-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Folker, AP, Andersen, H & Sandøe, P 2008, 'Implicit normativity in scientific advice: values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice', Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 199-206. <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/perspectives_in_biology_and_medicine/v051/51.2.folker.pdf>

APA

Folker, A. P., Andersen, H., & Sandøe, P. (2008). Implicit normativity in scientific advice: values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(2), 199-206. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/perspectives_in_biology_and_medicine/v051/51.2.folker.pdf

Vancouver

Folker AP, Andersen H, Sandøe P. Implicit normativity in scientific advice: values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2008;51(2):199-206.

Author

Folker, Anna Paldam ; Andersen, Hanne ; Sandøe, Peter. / Implicit normativity in scientific advice : values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice. In: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 199-206.

Bibtex

@article{f3cd5e00a1c311ddb6ae000ea68e967b,
title = "Implicit normativity in scientific advice: values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice",
abstract = "This paper focuses on implicit normative considerations underlying scientific advice-those normative questions, decisions, or issues that scientific advisers and the general public are not fully aware of but that nevertheless have implications for the character of the advice given. Using nutritional science as an example, we identify three such implicit normative issues. The first concerns the aim of scientific advice: whether it is about avoiding harm or promoting good. The second concerns the intended beneficiaries of the advice: whether advice should be framed to benefit the society as a whole or with special concern for the most vulnerable members of the population. The third consideration involves scientific advisers' attempts to balance the strengths of the scientific evidence with the expected consequences of scientific advice. We hope to promote more explicit discussion of these issues among scientific advisers and a wider public.",
author = "Folker, {Anna Paldam} and Hanne Andersen and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "199--206",
journal = "Perspectives in Biology and Medicine",
issn = "0031-5982",
publisher = "TheJohns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit normativity in scientific advice

T2 - values in nutrition scientists' decisions to give public advice

AU - Folker, Anna Paldam

AU - Andersen, Hanne

AU - Sandøe, Peter

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper focuses on implicit normative considerations underlying scientific advice-those normative questions, decisions, or issues that scientific advisers and the general public are not fully aware of but that nevertheless have implications for the character of the advice given. Using nutritional science as an example, we identify three such implicit normative issues. The first concerns the aim of scientific advice: whether it is about avoiding harm or promoting good. The second concerns the intended beneficiaries of the advice: whether advice should be framed to benefit the society as a whole or with special concern for the most vulnerable members of the population. The third consideration involves scientific advisers' attempts to balance the strengths of the scientific evidence with the expected consequences of scientific advice. We hope to promote more explicit discussion of these issues among scientific advisers and a wider public.

AB - This paper focuses on implicit normative considerations underlying scientific advice-those normative questions, decisions, or issues that scientific advisers and the general public are not fully aware of but that nevertheless have implications for the character of the advice given. Using nutritional science as an example, we identify three such implicit normative issues. The first concerns the aim of scientific advice: whether it is about avoiding harm or promoting good. The second concerns the intended beneficiaries of the advice: whether advice should be framed to benefit the society as a whole or with special concern for the most vulnerable members of the population. The third consideration involves scientific advisers' attempts to balance the strengths of the scientific evidence with the expected consequences of scientific advice. We hope to promote more explicit discussion of these issues among scientific advisers and a wider public.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 199

EP - 206

JO - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

JF - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

SN - 0031-5982

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 8106424