Painful dilemmas: a study of the way the public’s assessment of animal research balances costs to animals against human benefits

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

The conflict between animal costs and human benefits has dominated public as well as academic debates about animal research. However, surveys of public perceptions of animal research rarely focus on this part of attitude formation. This paper traces the prevalence of different attitudes to animal research in the public when people are asked to take benefit and cost considerations into account concurrently. Results from the examination of two representative samples of the Danish public identify three reproducible attitude stances. Approximately 30–35% of people questioned approved of animal research quite strongly, and 15–20% opposed animal research. The remaining 50% were reserved in their views. Further studies will ideally use the measure developed here to make possible relatively fine-grained comparisons and understandings of differences between populations and changes in attitudes over time.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume23
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)428-444
Number of pages17
ISSN0963-6625
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 40879333