Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle. / Jan, Jie Sheng; McIntosh, Wm Alex; Dean, Wesley; Scott, H. Morgan.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 106, No. 1, 2012, p. 24-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jan, JS, McIntosh, WA, Dean, W & Scott, HM 2012, 'Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012

APA

Jan, J. S., McIntosh, W. A., Dean, W., & Scott, H. M. (2012). Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 106(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012

Vancouver

Jan JS, McIntosh WA, Dean W, Scott HM. Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2012;106(1):24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012

Author

Jan, Jie Sheng ; McIntosh, Wm Alex ; Dean, Wesley ; Scott, H. Morgan. / Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle. In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 24-33.

Bibtex

@article{1d1237462f674fdcaf003abc16f6ce1f,
title = "Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle",
abstract = "Concerns exist that some uses of antimicrobials in cattle may lead to the emergence, proliferation, dissemination and persistence of resistant pathogenic bacteria in animal agriculture, which in turn can infect humans via the food supply. The degree of perceived risk varies with the clinical indication for which the antimicrobial in question is used. In this study, four uses of antimicrobials are considered, including in acutely sick, chronically sick, at-risk, and high-risk cattle, contrasting the degree of risk among these uses. Using a random sample of 103 feedlot cattle veterinarians and variables drawn from the theory of planned behavior, we predict differences in risk perception by clinical indication with differences in perceived efficacy of antimicrobials, social pressures to use antimicrobials, and moral obligations to use antimicrobials. In most models, veterinarians who perceived that others in the feedlot industry (i.e., other feedlot veterinarians, nutritionists, feedlot clients, and retained owners of cattle) were more likely to expect them to use antimicrobials in one situation versus another, the less likely those veterinarians perceived the risk of antimicrobial risk to be greater in the former versus the latter situation. Only two of these contrasts contained influences outside the immediate feedlot relationships. This exception involves the 'downstream' public: meat packers, retailers, and consumers. Veterinarians who believe that using antimicrobials for acutely sick cattle is more beneficial than using antimicrobials for chronically sick cattle were more likely to believe that antimicrobial resistance was a less probable outcome in acutely sick cattle than in chronically sick cattle.",
keywords = "Antimicrobial resistance, Efficacy, Feedlot cattle, Perceived risk, Veterinarians",
author = "Jan, {Jie Sheng} and McIntosh, {Wm Alex} and Wesley Dean and Scott, {H. Morgan}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "24--33",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle

AU - Jan, Jie Sheng

AU - McIntosh, Wm Alex

AU - Dean, Wesley

AU - Scott, H. Morgan

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Concerns exist that some uses of antimicrobials in cattle may lead to the emergence, proliferation, dissemination and persistence of resistant pathogenic bacteria in animal agriculture, which in turn can infect humans via the food supply. The degree of perceived risk varies with the clinical indication for which the antimicrobial in question is used. In this study, four uses of antimicrobials are considered, including in acutely sick, chronically sick, at-risk, and high-risk cattle, contrasting the degree of risk among these uses. Using a random sample of 103 feedlot cattle veterinarians and variables drawn from the theory of planned behavior, we predict differences in risk perception by clinical indication with differences in perceived efficacy of antimicrobials, social pressures to use antimicrobials, and moral obligations to use antimicrobials. In most models, veterinarians who perceived that others in the feedlot industry (i.e., other feedlot veterinarians, nutritionists, feedlot clients, and retained owners of cattle) were more likely to expect them to use antimicrobials in one situation versus another, the less likely those veterinarians perceived the risk of antimicrobial risk to be greater in the former versus the latter situation. Only two of these contrasts contained influences outside the immediate feedlot relationships. This exception involves the 'downstream' public: meat packers, retailers, and consumers. Veterinarians who believe that using antimicrobials for acutely sick cattle is more beneficial than using antimicrobials for chronically sick cattle were more likely to believe that antimicrobial resistance was a less probable outcome in acutely sick cattle than in chronically sick cattle.

AB - Concerns exist that some uses of antimicrobials in cattle may lead to the emergence, proliferation, dissemination and persistence of resistant pathogenic bacteria in animal agriculture, which in turn can infect humans via the food supply. The degree of perceived risk varies with the clinical indication for which the antimicrobial in question is used. In this study, four uses of antimicrobials are considered, including in acutely sick, chronically sick, at-risk, and high-risk cattle, contrasting the degree of risk among these uses. Using a random sample of 103 feedlot cattle veterinarians and variables drawn from the theory of planned behavior, we predict differences in risk perception by clinical indication with differences in perceived efficacy of antimicrobials, social pressures to use antimicrobials, and moral obligations to use antimicrobials. In most models, veterinarians who perceived that others in the feedlot industry (i.e., other feedlot veterinarians, nutritionists, feedlot clients, and retained owners of cattle) were more likely to expect them to use antimicrobials in one situation versus another, the less likely those veterinarians perceived the risk of antimicrobial risk to be greater in the former versus the latter situation. Only two of these contrasts contained influences outside the immediate feedlot relationships. This exception involves the 'downstream' public: meat packers, retailers, and consumers. Veterinarians who believe that using antimicrobials for acutely sick cattle is more beneficial than using antimicrobials for chronically sick cattle were more likely to believe that antimicrobial resistance was a less probable outcome in acutely sick cattle than in chronically sick cattle.

KW - Antimicrobial resistance

KW - Efficacy

KW - Feedlot cattle

KW - Perceived risk

KW - Veterinarians

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22391020

AN - SCOPUS:84863880103

VL - 106

SP - 24

EP - 33

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 255454983