Public participation – a loser’s game?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Communication

Standard

Public participation – a loser’s game? / Lassen, Jesper; Nielsen, Annika Porsborg; Sandøe, Peter.

In: People & Science, No. 6, 2011, p. 23.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Communication

Harvard

Lassen, J, Nielsen, AP & Sandøe, P 2011, 'Public participation – a loser’s game?', People & Science, no. 6, pp. 23.

APA

Lassen, J., Nielsen, A. P., & Sandøe, P. (2011). Public participation – a loser’s game? People & Science, (6), 23.

Vancouver

Lassen J, Nielsen AP, Sandøe P. Public participation – a loser’s game? People & Science. 2011;(6):23.

Author

Lassen, Jesper ; Nielsen, Annika Porsborg ; Sandøe, Peter. / Public participation – a loser’s game?. In: People & Science. 2011 ; No. 6. pp. 23.

Bibtex

@article{4f59fac8f27d45c8a8cd139a5783d06a,
title = "Public participation – a loser{\textquoteright}s game?",
abstract = "Some societal issues raised by science and technology are examined in participatory processes that engage the public as a whole. Yet other, apparently similar issues are handled with little public involvement. Looking at two specific issues, we tried to explain this contrast — to say why initiatives to involve the public were so much more energetic in one case than they were in the other. The issues were GM foods and functional foods.",
author = "Jesper Lassen and Nielsen, {Annika Porsborg} and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
pages = "23",
journal = "People & Science",
issn = "0268-490x",
publisher = "British Science Association",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation – a loser’s game?

AU - Lassen, Jesper

AU - Nielsen, Annika Porsborg

AU - Sandøe, Peter

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Some societal issues raised by science and technology are examined in participatory processes that engage the public as a whole. Yet other, apparently similar issues are handled with little public involvement. Looking at two specific issues, we tried to explain this contrast — to say why initiatives to involve the public were so much more energetic in one case than they were in the other. The issues were GM foods and functional foods.

AB - Some societal issues raised by science and technology are examined in participatory processes that engage the public as a whole. Yet other, apparently similar issues are handled with little public involvement. Looking at two specific issues, we tried to explain this contrast — to say why initiatives to involve the public were so much more energetic in one case than they were in the other. The issues were GM foods and functional foods.

M3 - Journal article

SP - 23

JO - People & Science

JF - People & Science

SN - 0268-490x

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 37806974