Public participation and appeal rights in decision-making on wind energy infrastructure: a comparative analysis of the Danish and English legal framework
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Chiara Armeni, Helle Tegner Anker
This article is concerned with public participation and its linkages with appeal rights in planning decisions for major onshore wind farms in England and Denmark. We are particularly interested in how the legal framework shapes the scope of participation and appeals and, more specifically, whether a third party right to appeal (TPRA) has a participatory potential beyond the initial decision-making process. Despite structural differences, our analysis shows that in both countries the legal frameworks limit the participatory potential of administrative appeals, either through a restricted third party access to appeal mechanisms or through a restricted scope of review in appeals. Even where access is unrestricted, TPRA can hardly constitute an extension of participation, unless the scope for review is equally extended. Thus, reliance on TPRA as a participatory tool would require changes to the legal framework in both jurisdictions.
|Journal||Journal of Environmental Planning and Management|
|Number of pages||20|
|Publication status||E-pub ahead of print - 14 Jun 2019|