TY - JOUR

T1 - Wind energy projects and species protection law

T2 - A comparative analysis of the application of eu law in five member states

AU - Akerboom, Sanne

AU - Anker, Helle Tegner

AU - Backes, Chris

AU - Bovet, Jana

AU - Cavallin, Elissa

AU - Cliquet, An

AU - Köck, Wolfgang

AU - Mathews, Fiona

AU - McGillivray, Donald

AU - Schoukens, Hendrik

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Wind farms and their associated transmission infrastructure can have negative impact on biodiversity. Offshore wind farms, for example, can pose threats to animals like harbour porpoises and migrating birds and onshore wind farms and transmission grids may harm birds and bats. In this article we analyse how European Union species protection law is transposed and applied to decision-making on wind energy projects in five member states, namely Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom. The analysis aims to understand the differences in the interpretation and application of national species protection law, point out deficiencies, and make recommendations, partly based on learning from best practices. Though transposition in national law is almost identical, implementation practice in these states varies substantially. The question is raised whether the legal regime, as currently applied, can be improved to serve the aims of a considerable increase of renewable energy sources whilst simultaneously protecting biodiversity.

AB - Wind farms and their associated transmission infrastructure can have negative impact on biodiversity. Offshore wind farms, for example, can pose threats to animals like harbour porpoises and migrating birds and onshore wind farms and transmission grids may harm birds and bats. In this article we analyse how European Union species protection law is transposed and applied to decision-making on wind energy projects in five member states, namely Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom. The analysis aims to understand the differences in the interpretation and application of national species protection law, point out deficiencies, and make recommendations, partly based on learning from best practices. Though transposition in national law is almost identical, implementation practice in these states varies substantially. The question is raised whether the legal regime, as currently applied, can be improved to serve the aims of a considerable increase of renewable energy sources whilst simultaneously protecting biodiversity.

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85072600226

VL - 28

SP - 144

EP - 158

JO - European Energy and Environmental Law Review

JF - European Energy and Environmental Law Review

SN - 1879-3886

IS - 4

ER -