Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries: A literature review

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Standard

Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries : A literature review. / Jensen, Frank.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 157, 105839, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Jensen, F 2023, 'Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries: A literature review', Marine Policy, vol. 157, 105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839

APA

Jensen, F. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries: A literature review. Marine Policy, 157, [105839]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839

Vancouver

Jensen F. Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries: A literature review. Marine Policy. 2023;157. 105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839

Author

Jensen, Frank. / Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries : A literature review. In: Marine Policy. 2023 ; Vol. 157.

Bibtex

@article{198ab11435534393a17eb4b74fb0e7d7,
title = "Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries: A literature review",
abstract = "User rights are an important topic in discussions of fisheries management. A user right can be defined as right to harvest from fish stocks; therefore, these rights are seen as a subset of property rights. Economists would normally argue that strong user rights (SURFs) should be implemented for fisheries, but the introduction of SURFs. affects a society in a complex way. By conducting a literature review, we have identified the advantages and disadvantages of introducing SURFs. We are mainly interested in short-run and long-run efficiency-related economic effects, but we have also identified major nonefficiency-related economic effects, social effects and environmental or biological effects. Due to the disadvantages we will also briefly discuss alternatives to SURFs",
author = "Frank Jensen",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advantages and disadvantages of introducing strong user rights in fisheries

T2 - A literature review

AU - Jensen, Frank

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - User rights are an important topic in discussions of fisheries management. A user right can be defined as right to harvest from fish stocks; therefore, these rights are seen as a subset of property rights. Economists would normally argue that strong user rights (SURFs) should be implemented for fisheries, but the introduction of SURFs. affects a society in a complex way. By conducting a literature review, we have identified the advantages and disadvantages of introducing SURFs. We are mainly interested in short-run and long-run efficiency-related economic effects, but we have also identified major nonefficiency-related economic effects, social effects and environmental or biological effects. Due to the disadvantages we will also briefly discuss alternatives to SURFs

AB - User rights are an important topic in discussions of fisheries management. A user right can be defined as right to harvest from fish stocks; therefore, these rights are seen as a subset of property rights. Economists would normally argue that strong user rights (SURFs) should be implemented for fisheries, but the introduction of SURFs. affects a society in a complex way. By conducting a literature review, we have identified the advantages and disadvantages of introducing SURFs. We are mainly interested in short-run and long-run efficiency-related economic effects, but we have also identified major nonefficiency-related economic effects, social effects and environmental or biological effects. Due to the disadvantages we will also briefly discuss alternatives to SURFs

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105839

M3 - Review

VL - 157

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

M1 - 105839

ER -

ID: 371295297