Costs and benefits of (in)coherence: Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas

Research output: Other contributionNet publication - Internet publicationCommunication

Standard

Costs and benefits of (in)coherence : Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas. / Sandholz, Simone; Wannewitz, Mia; Moure, Mar; Garschagen, Matthias.

United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). 2020, Interactive website: synthesis report .

Research output: Other contributionNet publication - Internet publicationCommunication

Harvard

Sandholz, S, Wannewitz, M, Moure, M & Garschagen, M 2020, Costs and benefits of (in)coherence: Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas. United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). <https://united-nations-university.preview.foleon.com/cohere/costs-and-benefits-of-in-coherence-copy-1/overview/>

APA

Sandholz, S., Wannewitz, M., Moure, M., & Garschagen, M. (2020, Mar 20). Costs and benefits of (in)coherence: Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas. United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). https://united-nations-university.preview.foleon.com/cohere/costs-and-benefits-of-in-coherence-copy-1/overview/

Vancouver

Sandholz S, Wannewitz M, Moure M, Garschagen M. Costs and benefits of (in)coherence: Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas. 2020.

Author

Sandholz, Simone ; Wannewitz, Mia ; Moure, Mar ; Garschagen, Matthias. / Costs and benefits of (in)coherence : Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas. 2020. United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).

Bibtex

@misc{76e20806a13e4254856dd61cbcf6cfaa,
title = "Costs and benefits of (in)coherence: Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas",
abstract = "When comparing the results from both country cases against the costs and benefits identified in the literature review, we see some stark differences. While scientific literature tends to focus on the macro level (e.g. reinforcement of political market imperfections), the anecdotal evidence derived from the perception of public servants also covers a number of practical issues such as clashing leadership or dealing with disagreement, particularly at the local level. Moreover, anecdotal evidence also provides multiple examples of the psychological and behavioral elements at play both in perpetuating the status quo and in attempting change, a dimension mostly lacking in the literature. Examples include reputational and political costs, demotivation of personnel and mistrust.",
author = "Simone Sandholz and Mia Wannewitz and Mar Moure and Matthias Garschagen",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "20",
language = "English",
publisher = "United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS)",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - ICOMM

T1 - Costs and benefits of (in)coherence

T2 - Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post-2015-Agendas

AU - Sandholz, Simone

AU - Wannewitz, Mia

AU - Moure, Mar

AU - Garschagen, Matthias

PY - 2020/3/20

Y1 - 2020/3/20

N2 - When comparing the results from both country cases against the costs and benefits identified in the literature review, we see some stark differences. While scientific literature tends to focus on the macro level (e.g. reinforcement of political market imperfections), the anecdotal evidence derived from the perception of public servants also covers a number of practical issues such as clashing leadership or dealing with disagreement, particularly at the local level. Moreover, anecdotal evidence also provides multiple examples of the psychological and behavioral elements at play both in perpetuating the status quo and in attempting change, a dimension mostly lacking in the literature. Examples include reputational and political costs, demotivation of personnel and mistrust.

AB - When comparing the results from both country cases against the costs and benefits identified in the literature review, we see some stark differences. While scientific literature tends to focus on the macro level (e.g. reinforcement of political market imperfections), the anecdotal evidence derived from the perception of public servants also covers a number of practical issues such as clashing leadership or dealing with disagreement, particularly at the local level. Moreover, anecdotal evidence also provides multiple examples of the psychological and behavioral elements at play both in perpetuating the status quo and in attempting change, a dimension mostly lacking in the literature. Examples include reputational and political costs, demotivation of personnel and mistrust.

M3 - Net publication - Internet publication

PB - United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS)

ER -

ID: 259936694