Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries. / Filyushkina, Anna; Strange, Niels; Löf, Magnus; Ezebilo, Eugene E.; Boman, Mattias.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2016, p. 99-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Filyushkina, A, Strange, N, Löf, M, Ezebilo, EE & Boman, M 2016, 'Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries', Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643

APA

Filyushkina, A., Strange, N., Löf, M., Ezebilo, E. E., & Boman, M. (2016). Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 31(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643

Vancouver

Filyushkina A, Strange N, Löf M, Ezebilo EE, Boman M. Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2016;31(1):99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643

Author

Filyushkina, Anna ; Strange, Niels ; Löf, Magnus ; Ezebilo, Eugene E. ; Boman, Mattias. / Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries. In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 99-110.

Bibtex

@article{3d3049a5bb584a558c2cfe1adf91b845,
title = "Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries",
abstract = "The need to integrate non-market ecosystem services into decision-making is widely acknowledged. Despite the exponentially growing body of literature, trade-offs between services are still poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of published literature in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland) on the integration of non-market forest ecosystem services into decision-making. The aim of the review was two-fold: (1) to provide an overview of coverage of biophysical and socio-economic assessments of non-market ecosystem services in relation to forest management; (2) to determine the extent of the integration of biophysical and socio-economic models of these services into decision support models. Our findings reveal the need for wider coverage of non-market ecosystem services and evidence-based modelling of how forest management regimes affect ecosystem services. Furthermore, temporal and spatial modelling of ecosystem impacts remains a challenge. We observed a few examples of multiple non-market services assessments. Integration of non-market services into decision support was performed with either biophysical or socio-economic models, often using proxies and composite indicators. The review reveals that there is scope for more comprehensive and integrated model development, including multiple ecosystem services and appropriate handling of forest management impacts.",
keywords = "decision support, Ecosystem services, forest management, review, trade-offs, valuation",
author = "Anna Filyushkina and Niels Strange and Magnus L{\"o}f and Ezebilo, {Eugene E.} and Mattias Boman",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "99--110",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research",
issn = "0282-7581",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Scandinavia",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries

AU - Filyushkina, Anna

AU - Strange, Niels

AU - Löf, Magnus

AU - Ezebilo, Eugene E.

AU - Boman, Mattias

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The need to integrate non-market ecosystem services into decision-making is widely acknowledged. Despite the exponentially growing body of literature, trade-offs between services are still poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of published literature in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland) on the integration of non-market forest ecosystem services into decision-making. The aim of the review was two-fold: (1) to provide an overview of coverage of biophysical and socio-economic assessments of non-market ecosystem services in relation to forest management; (2) to determine the extent of the integration of biophysical and socio-economic models of these services into decision support models. Our findings reveal the need for wider coverage of non-market ecosystem services and evidence-based modelling of how forest management regimes affect ecosystem services. Furthermore, temporal and spatial modelling of ecosystem impacts remains a challenge. We observed a few examples of multiple non-market services assessments. Integration of non-market services into decision support was performed with either biophysical or socio-economic models, often using proxies and composite indicators. The review reveals that there is scope for more comprehensive and integrated model development, including multiple ecosystem services and appropriate handling of forest management impacts.

AB - The need to integrate non-market ecosystem services into decision-making is widely acknowledged. Despite the exponentially growing body of literature, trade-offs between services are still poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of published literature in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland) on the integration of non-market forest ecosystem services into decision-making. The aim of the review was two-fold: (1) to provide an overview of coverage of biophysical and socio-economic assessments of non-market ecosystem services in relation to forest management; (2) to determine the extent of the integration of biophysical and socio-economic models of these services into decision support models. Our findings reveal the need for wider coverage of non-market ecosystem services and evidence-based modelling of how forest management regimes affect ecosystem services. Furthermore, temporal and spatial modelling of ecosystem impacts remains a challenge. We observed a few examples of multiple non-market services assessments. Integration of non-market services into decision support was performed with either biophysical or socio-economic models, often using proxies and composite indicators. The review reveals that there is scope for more comprehensive and integrated model development, including multiple ecosystem services and appropriate handling of forest management impacts.

KW - decision support

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - forest management

KW - review

KW - trade-offs

KW - valuation

U2 - 10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643

DO - 10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84947047494

VL - 31

SP - 99

EP - 110

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

SN - 0282-7581

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 160101155