Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden : historical lessons and emerging issues. / Graversgaard, Morten; Jacobsen, Brian H.; Hoffmann, Carl Christian; Dalgaard, Tommy; Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard; Kjaergaard, Charlotte; Powell, Neil; Strand, John A.; Feuerbach, Peter; Tonderski, Karin.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 101, 105206, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Graversgaard, M, Jacobsen, BH, Hoffmann, CC, Dalgaard, T, Odgaard, MV, Kjaergaard, C, Powell, N, Strand, JA, Feuerbach, P & Tonderski, K 2021, 'Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues', Land Use Policy, vol. 101, 105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206

APA

Graversgaard, M., Jacobsen, B. H., Hoffmann, C. C., Dalgaard, T., Odgaard, M. V., Kjaergaard, C., Powell, N., Strand, J. A., Feuerbach, P., & Tonderski, K. (2021). Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues. Land Use Policy, 101, [105206]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206

Vancouver

Graversgaard M, Jacobsen BH, Hoffmann CC, Dalgaard T, Odgaard MV, Kjaergaard C et al. Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues. Land Use Policy. 2021;101. 105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206

Author

Graversgaard, Morten ; Jacobsen, Brian H. ; Hoffmann, Carl Christian ; Dalgaard, Tommy ; Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard ; Kjaergaard, Charlotte ; Powell, Neil ; Strand, John A. ; Feuerbach, Peter ; Tonderski, Karin. / Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden : historical lessons and emerging issues. In: Land Use Policy. 2021 ; Vol. 101.

Bibtex

@article{e0e2ac1faa5840ab8ef1b653be1d2c18,
title = "Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues",
abstract = "Natural wetlands used to cover a significant part of the landscape, but these ecosystems have declined by >50% worldwide, and even more in Denmark and Sweden. However, since the 1980s, various policies have been implemented to restore and create wetlands. This study provides a comprehensive historical overview of policies used to stimulate the creation and restoration of wetlands in Denmark and Sweden, and also analyses what factors have facilitated participation or have been barriers for landowners. The analysis of wetlands implementation programmes in Denmark showed a change towards narrower focus on nitrogen reduction from 1998 and onwards, whereas policies in Sweden often have had a wider multifunctional purpose. In both countries, there has been a change in the compensation structure from a lump sum to annual payments, parallel to an observed increase in costs for wetlands implementation. There is still a large potential for recreating many more wetlands, and the national targets have not been reached in neither Denmark nor Sweden. Key success factors, for future wetlands implementation are sufficient compensation levels, flexible scheme designs and information-based strategies documenting relevant benefits and sustainability issues. In general, more advice and support from the state, regional and local participants, and farmers{\textquoteright} organisations, are required to increase the participation and achieve successful and cost-efficient wetlands implementation. A collaborative and catchment-based approach holds promise, where wetland governance can serve as a platform for collaboration between policy bodies and between farmers. Additionally, politicians and decision makers need to accept the area targets presented to them when setting policy goals for wetlands implementation, and to accept that restoring and constructing wetlands requires long implementation times before results can be demonstrated.",
author = "Morten Graversgaard and Jacobsen, {Brian H.} and Hoffmann, {Carl Christian} and Tommy Dalgaard and Odgaard, {Mette Vestergaard} and Charlotte Kjaergaard and Neil Powell and Strand, {John A.} and Peter Feuerbach and Karin Tonderski",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden

T2 - historical lessons and emerging issues

AU - Graversgaard, Morten

AU - Jacobsen, Brian H.

AU - Hoffmann, Carl Christian

AU - Dalgaard, Tommy

AU - Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard

AU - Kjaergaard, Charlotte

AU - Powell, Neil

AU - Strand, John A.

AU - Feuerbach, Peter

AU - Tonderski, Karin

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Natural wetlands used to cover a significant part of the landscape, but these ecosystems have declined by >50% worldwide, and even more in Denmark and Sweden. However, since the 1980s, various policies have been implemented to restore and create wetlands. This study provides a comprehensive historical overview of policies used to stimulate the creation and restoration of wetlands in Denmark and Sweden, and also analyses what factors have facilitated participation or have been barriers for landowners. The analysis of wetlands implementation programmes in Denmark showed a change towards narrower focus on nitrogen reduction from 1998 and onwards, whereas policies in Sweden often have had a wider multifunctional purpose. In both countries, there has been a change in the compensation structure from a lump sum to annual payments, parallel to an observed increase in costs for wetlands implementation. There is still a large potential for recreating many more wetlands, and the national targets have not been reached in neither Denmark nor Sweden. Key success factors, for future wetlands implementation are sufficient compensation levels, flexible scheme designs and information-based strategies documenting relevant benefits and sustainability issues. In general, more advice and support from the state, regional and local participants, and farmers’ organisations, are required to increase the participation and achieve successful and cost-efficient wetlands implementation. A collaborative and catchment-based approach holds promise, where wetland governance can serve as a platform for collaboration between policy bodies and between farmers. Additionally, politicians and decision makers need to accept the area targets presented to them when setting policy goals for wetlands implementation, and to accept that restoring and constructing wetlands requires long implementation times before results can be demonstrated.

AB - Natural wetlands used to cover a significant part of the landscape, but these ecosystems have declined by >50% worldwide, and even more in Denmark and Sweden. However, since the 1980s, various policies have been implemented to restore and create wetlands. This study provides a comprehensive historical overview of policies used to stimulate the creation and restoration of wetlands in Denmark and Sweden, and also analyses what factors have facilitated participation or have been barriers for landowners. The analysis of wetlands implementation programmes in Denmark showed a change towards narrower focus on nitrogen reduction from 1998 and onwards, whereas policies in Sweden often have had a wider multifunctional purpose. In both countries, there has been a change in the compensation structure from a lump sum to annual payments, parallel to an observed increase in costs for wetlands implementation. There is still a large potential for recreating many more wetlands, and the national targets have not been reached in neither Denmark nor Sweden. Key success factors, for future wetlands implementation are sufficient compensation levels, flexible scheme designs and information-based strategies documenting relevant benefits and sustainability issues. In general, more advice and support from the state, regional and local participants, and farmers’ organisations, are required to increase the participation and achieve successful and cost-efficient wetlands implementation. A collaborative and catchment-based approach holds promise, where wetland governance can serve as a platform for collaboration between policy bodies and between farmers. Additionally, politicians and decision makers need to accept the area targets presented to them when setting policy goals for wetlands implementation, and to accept that restoring and constructing wetlands requires long implementation times before results can be demonstrated.

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85097857614

VL - 101

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 105206

ER -

ID: 256217955