Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden: historical lessons and emerging issues
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden : historical lessons and emerging issues. / Graversgaard, Morten; Jacobsen, Brian H.; Hoffmann, Carl Christian; Dalgaard, Tommy; Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard; Kjaergaard, Charlotte; Powell, Neil; Strand, John A.; Feuerbach, Peter; Tonderski, Karin.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 101, 105206, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden
T2 - historical lessons and emerging issues
AU - Graversgaard, Morten
AU - Jacobsen, Brian H.
AU - Hoffmann, Carl Christian
AU - Dalgaard, Tommy
AU - Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
AU - Kjaergaard, Charlotte
AU - Powell, Neil
AU - Strand, John A.
AU - Feuerbach, Peter
AU - Tonderski, Karin
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Natural wetlands used to cover a significant part of the landscape, but these ecosystems have declined by >50% worldwide, and even more in Denmark and Sweden. However, since the 1980s, various policies have been implemented to restore and create wetlands. This study provides a comprehensive historical overview of policies used to stimulate the creation and restoration of wetlands in Denmark and Sweden, and also analyses what factors have facilitated participation or have been barriers for landowners. The analysis of wetlands implementation programmes in Denmark showed a change towards narrower focus on nitrogen reduction from 1998 and onwards, whereas policies in Sweden often have had a wider multifunctional purpose. In both countries, there has been a change in the compensation structure from a lump sum to annual payments, parallel to an observed increase in costs for wetlands implementation. There is still a large potential for recreating many more wetlands, and the national targets have not been reached in neither Denmark nor Sweden. Key success factors, for future wetlands implementation are sufficient compensation levels, flexible scheme designs and information-based strategies documenting relevant benefits and sustainability issues. In general, more advice and support from the state, regional and local participants, and farmers’ organisations, are required to increase the participation and achieve successful and cost-efficient wetlands implementation. A collaborative and catchment-based approach holds promise, where wetland governance can serve as a platform for collaboration between policy bodies and between farmers. Additionally, politicians and decision makers need to accept the area targets presented to them when setting policy goals for wetlands implementation, and to accept that restoring and constructing wetlands requires long implementation times before results can be demonstrated.
AB - Natural wetlands used to cover a significant part of the landscape, but these ecosystems have declined by >50% worldwide, and even more in Denmark and Sweden. However, since the 1980s, various policies have been implemented to restore and create wetlands. This study provides a comprehensive historical overview of policies used to stimulate the creation and restoration of wetlands in Denmark and Sweden, and also analyses what factors have facilitated participation or have been barriers for landowners. The analysis of wetlands implementation programmes in Denmark showed a change towards narrower focus on nitrogen reduction from 1998 and onwards, whereas policies in Sweden often have had a wider multifunctional purpose. In both countries, there has been a change in the compensation structure from a lump sum to annual payments, parallel to an observed increase in costs for wetlands implementation. There is still a large potential for recreating many more wetlands, and the national targets have not been reached in neither Denmark nor Sweden. Key success factors, for future wetlands implementation are sufficient compensation levels, flexible scheme designs and information-based strategies documenting relevant benefits and sustainability issues. In general, more advice and support from the state, regional and local participants, and farmers’ organisations, are required to increase the participation and achieve successful and cost-efficient wetlands implementation. A collaborative and catchment-based approach holds promise, where wetland governance can serve as a platform for collaboration between policy bodies and between farmers. Additionally, politicians and decision makers need to accept the area targets presented to them when setting policy goals for wetlands implementation, and to accept that restoring and constructing wetlands requires long implementation times before results can be demonstrated.
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105206
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85097857614
VL - 101
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
SN - 0264-8377
M1 - 105206
ER -
ID: 256217955