Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies. / Karampela, Irene; Sakelliou, Alexandra; Vallianou, Natalia; Christodoulatos, Gerasimos-Socrates; Magkos, Faidon; Dalamaga, Maria.

In: Current Obesity Reports, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021, p. 162-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Karampela, I, Sakelliou, A, Vallianou, N, Christodoulatos, G-S, Magkos, F & Dalamaga, M 2021, 'Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies', Current Obesity Reports, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1

APA

Karampela, I., Sakelliou, A., Vallianou, N., Christodoulatos, G-S., Magkos, F., & Dalamaga, M. (2021). Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies. Current Obesity Reports, 10(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1

Vancouver

Karampela I, Sakelliou A, Vallianou N, Christodoulatos G-S, Magkos F, Dalamaga M. Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies. Current Obesity Reports. 2021;10(2):162-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1

Author

Karampela, Irene ; Sakelliou, Alexandra ; Vallianou, Natalia ; Christodoulatos, Gerasimos-Socrates ; Magkos, Faidon ; Dalamaga, Maria. / Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies. In: Current Obesity Reports. 2021 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 162-180.

Bibtex

@article{6544fee602f246f39a907a2da8929a4d,
title = "Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies",
abstract = "Purpose of review: Evidence from observational studies suggests that obesity is associated with low vitamin D. As both obesity and hypovitaminosis D present an alarmingly increased prevalence worldwide, there is an intense research interest to clarify all aspects of this association. This review summarizes current evidence from meta-analyses investigating vitamin D status in obesity, including the effects of weight loss and bariatric surgery on vitamin D status and the outcomes of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. We also discuss potential pathophysiologic mechanisms and important controversies.Recent findings: Data from meta-analyses consistently support an inverse association of vitamin D levels with body weight. However, the impact of weight loss on improving vitamin D status is small, while studies on the supplementation with vitamin D after bariatric surgery have shown conflicting results regarding vitamin D status. Moreover, interventional studies do not support a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. These findings warrant a cautious interpretation due to important methodological limitations and confounding factors, such as high heterogeneity of studies, variable methods of determination of vitamin D and definition of deficiency/insufficiency, use of various adiposity measures and definitions of obesity, and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables influencing vitamin D levels. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms associating low vitamin D in obesity include volumetric dilution, sequestration into adipose tissue, limited sunlight exposure, and decreased vitamin D synthesis in the adipose tissue and liver. Experimental studies have demonstrated that low vitamin D may be implicated in adipose tissue differentiation and growth leading to obesity either by regulation of gene expression or through modulation of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and leptin. Summary: Obesity is associated with low vitamin D status but weight loss has little effect on improving this; vitamin D supplementation is also not associated with weight loss. Evidence regarding vitamin D status after bariatric surgery is contradicting. The link between vitamin D and obesity remains controversial due to important limitations and confounding of studies. More research is needed to clarify the complex interplay between vitamin D and adiposity.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Adipose tissue, Body mass index, Hypovitaminosis D, Obesity, Vitamin D, 25(OH)D",
author = "Irene Karampela and Alexandra Sakelliou and Natalia Vallianou and Gerasimos-Socrates Christodoulatos and Faidon Magkos and Maria Dalamaga",
note = "CURIS 2021 NEXS 118",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "162--180",
journal = "Current Obesity Reports",
issn = "2162-4968",
publisher = "Springer Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vitamin D and obesity: Current evidence and controversies

AU - Karampela, Irene

AU - Sakelliou, Alexandra

AU - Vallianou, Natalia

AU - Christodoulatos, Gerasimos-Socrates

AU - Magkos, Faidon

AU - Dalamaga, Maria

N1 - CURIS 2021 NEXS 118

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Purpose of review: Evidence from observational studies suggests that obesity is associated with low vitamin D. As both obesity and hypovitaminosis D present an alarmingly increased prevalence worldwide, there is an intense research interest to clarify all aspects of this association. This review summarizes current evidence from meta-analyses investigating vitamin D status in obesity, including the effects of weight loss and bariatric surgery on vitamin D status and the outcomes of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. We also discuss potential pathophysiologic mechanisms and important controversies.Recent findings: Data from meta-analyses consistently support an inverse association of vitamin D levels with body weight. However, the impact of weight loss on improving vitamin D status is small, while studies on the supplementation with vitamin D after bariatric surgery have shown conflicting results regarding vitamin D status. Moreover, interventional studies do not support a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. These findings warrant a cautious interpretation due to important methodological limitations and confounding factors, such as high heterogeneity of studies, variable methods of determination of vitamin D and definition of deficiency/insufficiency, use of various adiposity measures and definitions of obesity, and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables influencing vitamin D levels. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms associating low vitamin D in obesity include volumetric dilution, sequestration into adipose tissue, limited sunlight exposure, and decreased vitamin D synthesis in the adipose tissue and liver. Experimental studies have demonstrated that low vitamin D may be implicated in adipose tissue differentiation and growth leading to obesity either by regulation of gene expression or through modulation of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and leptin. Summary: Obesity is associated with low vitamin D status but weight loss has little effect on improving this; vitamin D supplementation is also not associated with weight loss. Evidence regarding vitamin D status after bariatric surgery is contradicting. The link between vitamin D and obesity remains controversial due to important limitations and confounding of studies. More research is needed to clarify the complex interplay between vitamin D and adiposity.

AB - Purpose of review: Evidence from observational studies suggests that obesity is associated with low vitamin D. As both obesity and hypovitaminosis D present an alarmingly increased prevalence worldwide, there is an intense research interest to clarify all aspects of this association. This review summarizes current evidence from meta-analyses investigating vitamin D status in obesity, including the effects of weight loss and bariatric surgery on vitamin D status and the outcomes of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. We also discuss potential pathophysiologic mechanisms and important controversies.Recent findings: Data from meta-analyses consistently support an inverse association of vitamin D levels with body weight. However, the impact of weight loss on improving vitamin D status is small, while studies on the supplementation with vitamin D after bariatric surgery have shown conflicting results regarding vitamin D status. Moreover, interventional studies do not support a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on body weight. These findings warrant a cautious interpretation due to important methodological limitations and confounding factors, such as high heterogeneity of studies, variable methods of determination of vitamin D and definition of deficiency/insufficiency, use of various adiposity measures and definitions of obesity, and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables influencing vitamin D levels. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms associating low vitamin D in obesity include volumetric dilution, sequestration into adipose tissue, limited sunlight exposure, and decreased vitamin D synthesis in the adipose tissue and liver. Experimental studies have demonstrated that low vitamin D may be implicated in adipose tissue differentiation and growth leading to obesity either by regulation of gene expression or through modulation of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and leptin. Summary: Obesity is associated with low vitamin D status but weight loss has little effect on improving this; vitamin D supplementation is also not associated with weight loss. Evidence regarding vitamin D status after bariatric surgery is contradicting. The link between vitamin D and obesity remains controversial due to important limitations and confounding of studies. More research is needed to clarify the complex interplay between vitamin D and adiposity.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Adipose tissue

KW - Body mass index

KW - Hypovitaminosis D

KW - Obesity

KW - Vitamin D

KW - 25(OH)D

U2 - 10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1

DO - 10.1007/s13679-021-00433-1

M3 - Review

C2 - 33792853

VL - 10

SP - 162

EP - 180

JO - Current Obesity Reports

JF - Current Obesity Reports

SN - 2162-4968

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 259508044