Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. / Ladenburg, Jacob; Olsen, Søren Bøye.

I: Resource and Energy Economics, Bind 37, 2014, s. 39-63.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ladenburg, J & Olsen, SB 2014, 'Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys', Resource and Energy Economics, bind 37, s. 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002

APA

Ladenburg, J., & Olsen, S. B. (2014). Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. Resource and Energy Economics, 37, 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002

Vancouver

Ladenburg J, Olsen SB. Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. Resource and Energy Economics. 2014;37:39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002

Author

Ladenburg, Jacob ; Olsen, Søren Bøye. / Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. I: Resource and Energy Economics. 2014 ; Bind 37. s. 39-63.

Bibtex

@article{c00a1a4c38624980b71d4afac737abfb,
title = "Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys",
abstract = "Hypothetical bias continues to be a major challenge for stated preference methods. Cheap Talk (CT) has been found to be an effective remedy in some applications, though empirical results are ambiguous. We discuss reasons why CT may fail to effectively remove specific types of hypothetical bias in Choice Experiments. We suggest augmenting CT in Choice Experiments with a so-called Opt-Out Reminder (OOR). Prior to each choice set, the OOR explicitly instructs respondents to choose the opt-out alternative, if they find the experimentally designed alternatives too expensive. In an empirical survey we find the OOR to significantly reduce total WTP and to some extent also marginal WTP beyond the capability of the CT applied without the OOR. This suggests that the CT practice should be adapted to fit the potentially different decision processes and repeated choices structure of the Choice Experiment format, rather than merely being adopted directly from Contingent Valuation.",
keywords = "Cheap Talk, Opt-Out Reminder, Choice Experiments, Hypothetical bias, Stream re-establishment, Opt-out effect",
author = "Jacob Ladenburg and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "39--63",
journal = "Resource and Energy Economics",
issn = "0928-7655",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys

AU - Ladenburg, Jacob

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Hypothetical bias continues to be a major challenge for stated preference methods. Cheap Talk (CT) has been found to be an effective remedy in some applications, though empirical results are ambiguous. We discuss reasons why CT may fail to effectively remove specific types of hypothetical bias in Choice Experiments. We suggest augmenting CT in Choice Experiments with a so-called Opt-Out Reminder (OOR). Prior to each choice set, the OOR explicitly instructs respondents to choose the opt-out alternative, if they find the experimentally designed alternatives too expensive. In an empirical survey we find the OOR to significantly reduce total WTP and to some extent also marginal WTP beyond the capability of the CT applied without the OOR. This suggests that the CT practice should be adapted to fit the potentially different decision processes and repeated choices structure of the Choice Experiment format, rather than merely being adopted directly from Contingent Valuation.

AB - Hypothetical bias continues to be a major challenge for stated preference methods. Cheap Talk (CT) has been found to be an effective remedy in some applications, though empirical results are ambiguous. We discuss reasons why CT may fail to effectively remove specific types of hypothetical bias in Choice Experiments. We suggest augmenting CT in Choice Experiments with a so-called Opt-Out Reminder (OOR). Prior to each choice set, the OOR explicitly instructs respondents to choose the opt-out alternative, if they find the experimentally designed alternatives too expensive. In an empirical survey we find the OOR to significantly reduce total WTP and to some extent also marginal WTP beyond the capability of the CT applied without the OOR. This suggests that the CT practice should be adapted to fit the potentially different decision processes and repeated choices structure of the Choice Experiment format, rather than merely being adopted directly from Contingent Valuation.

KW - Cheap Talk

KW - Opt-Out Reminder

KW - Choice Experiments

KW - Hypothetical bias

KW - Stream re-establishment

KW - Opt-out effect

U2 - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 39

EP - 63

JO - Resource and Energy Economics

JF - Resource and Energy Economics

SN - 0928-7655

ER -

ID: 132015128