Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. / Alemu, Mohammed Hussen; Olsen, Søren Bøye.

Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2017.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Alemu, MH & Olsen, SB 2017 'Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products' Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. <http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/foiwpaper/2017_5f05.htm>

APA

Alemu, M. H., & Olsen, S. B. (2017). Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. IFRO Working Paper Nr. 2017/05 http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/foiwpaper/2017_5f05.htm

Vancouver

Alemu MH, Olsen SB. Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2017.

Author

Alemu, Mohammed Hussen ; Olsen, Søren Bøye. / Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2017. (IFRO Working Paper ; Nr. 2017/05).

Bibtex

@techreport{60ac0112b6ca4a8db65f68be313dca75,
title = "Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments?: An application to consumer valuation of novel food products",
abstract = "Recent papers have suggested that use of a so-called Repeated Opt-Out Reminder (ROOR) might mitigate hypothetical bias in stated Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE), but evidence so far has only been circumstantial. We provide the first comprehensive test of whether a ROOR can actually mitigate hypothetical bias in stated DCE. The data originates from a field experiment concerning consumer preferences for a novel food product made from cricket flour. Utilizing a between-subject design with three treatments, we find significantly higher marginal willingness to pay values in hypothetical than in nonhypothetical settings, confirming the usual presence of hypothetical bias. Comparing this to a hypothetical setting where the ROOR is introduced, we find that the ROOR effectively eliminates hypothetical bias for one attribute and significantly reduces it for the rest of the attributes. Our results further suggest that these reductions of hypothetical bias are brought about by a decrease in the tendency to ignore the price attribute.",
author = "Alemu, {Mohammed Hussen} and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
series = "IFRO Working Paper ",
number = "2017/05",
publisher = "Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments?

T2 - An application to consumer valuation of novel food products

AU - Alemu, Mohammed Hussen

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Recent papers have suggested that use of a so-called Repeated Opt-Out Reminder (ROOR) might mitigate hypothetical bias in stated Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE), but evidence so far has only been circumstantial. We provide the first comprehensive test of whether a ROOR can actually mitigate hypothetical bias in stated DCE. The data originates from a field experiment concerning consumer preferences for a novel food product made from cricket flour. Utilizing a between-subject design with three treatments, we find significantly higher marginal willingness to pay values in hypothetical than in nonhypothetical settings, confirming the usual presence of hypothetical bias. Comparing this to a hypothetical setting where the ROOR is introduced, we find that the ROOR effectively eliminates hypothetical bias for one attribute and significantly reduces it for the rest of the attributes. Our results further suggest that these reductions of hypothetical bias are brought about by a decrease in the tendency to ignore the price attribute.

AB - Recent papers have suggested that use of a so-called Repeated Opt-Out Reminder (ROOR) might mitigate hypothetical bias in stated Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE), but evidence so far has only been circumstantial. We provide the first comprehensive test of whether a ROOR can actually mitigate hypothetical bias in stated DCE. The data originates from a field experiment concerning consumer preferences for a novel food product made from cricket flour. Utilizing a between-subject design with three treatments, we find significantly higher marginal willingness to pay values in hypothetical than in nonhypothetical settings, confirming the usual presence of hypothetical bias. Comparing this to a hypothetical setting where the ROOR is introduced, we find that the ROOR effectively eliminates hypothetical bias for one attribute and significantly reduces it for the rest of the attributes. Our results further suggest that these reductions of hypothetical bias are brought about by a decrease in the tendency to ignore the price attribute.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - IFRO Working Paper

BT - Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments?

PB - Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 178221097