Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts: the World Trade Organization and global private food standards

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts : the World Trade Organization and global private food standards. / Botterill, Linda Courtenay; Daugbjerg, Carsten.

I: European Political Science Review, Bind 7, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 23-42.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Botterill, LC & Daugbjerg, C 2015, 'Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts: the World Trade Organization and global private food standards', European Political Science Review, bind 7, nr. 1, s. 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000295

APA

Botterill, L. C., & Daugbjerg, C. (2015). Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts: the World Trade Organization and global private food standards. European Political Science Review, 7(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000295

Vancouver

Botterill LC, Daugbjerg C. Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts: the World Trade Organization and global private food standards. European Political Science Review. 2015;7(1):23-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000295

Author

Botterill, Linda Courtenay ; Daugbjerg, Carsten. / Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts : the World Trade Organization and global private food standards. I: European Political Science Review. 2015 ; Bind 7, Nr. 1. s. 23-42.

Bibtex

@article{7f7ca7c2ad0e4857b9659beeb53423ab,
title = "Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts: the World Trade Organization and global private food standards",
abstract = "An important outcome of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations was the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). This was set up to discipline the use of national food safety and animal and plant health regulations and to prevent their emergence as technical barriers to trade. The Agreement privileges free trade and scientific evidence, thus excluding many ethical considerations from the regulations that national governments can enact in relation to production methods in the agri-food chain. Autonomously from the SPS Agreement, a number of global private standard schemes have been developed that have incorporated values rejected by the SPS Agreement. This paper examines the relationship between the Agreement and the private standards and argues that this case highlights a gap in the institutional literature with respect to parallel institutions emerging autonomously from the primary institution to embody values excluded by the latter. We adopt the term commensalism for these previously undescribed relationships.",
keywords = "food standards, institutions, values, WTO",
author = "Botterill, {Linda Courtenay} and Carsten Daugbjerg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1017/S1755773913000295",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "23--42",
journal = "European Political Science Review",
issn = "1755-7739",
publisher = "cambridge university press (cup)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commensalistic institutions and value conflicts

T2 - the World Trade Organization and global private food standards

AU - Botterill, Linda Courtenay

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - An important outcome of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations was the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). This was set up to discipline the use of national food safety and animal and plant health regulations and to prevent their emergence as technical barriers to trade. The Agreement privileges free trade and scientific evidence, thus excluding many ethical considerations from the regulations that national governments can enact in relation to production methods in the agri-food chain. Autonomously from the SPS Agreement, a number of global private standard schemes have been developed that have incorporated values rejected by the SPS Agreement. This paper examines the relationship between the Agreement and the private standards and argues that this case highlights a gap in the institutional literature with respect to parallel institutions emerging autonomously from the primary institution to embody values excluded by the latter. We adopt the term commensalism for these previously undescribed relationships.

AB - An important outcome of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations was the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). This was set up to discipline the use of national food safety and animal and plant health regulations and to prevent their emergence as technical barriers to trade. The Agreement privileges free trade and scientific evidence, thus excluding many ethical considerations from the regulations that national governments can enact in relation to production methods in the agri-food chain. Autonomously from the SPS Agreement, a number of global private standard schemes have been developed that have incorporated values rejected by the SPS Agreement. This paper examines the relationship between the Agreement and the private standards and argues that this case highlights a gap in the institutional literature with respect to parallel institutions emerging autonomously from the primary institution to embody values excluded by the latter. We adopt the term commensalism for these previously undescribed relationships.

KW - food standards

KW - institutions

KW - values

KW - WTO

U2 - 10.1017/S1755773913000295

DO - 10.1017/S1755773913000295

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 23

EP - 42

JO - European Political Science Review

JF - European Political Science Review

SN - 1755-7739

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 154002141