Conserving rhinos by legal trade: Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Conserving rhinos by legal trade : Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers. / Dang, Vu Hoai Nam; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl.

EcoEvoRxiv, 2021.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Dang, VHN, Nielsen, MR & Jacobsen, JB 2021 'Conserving rhinos by legal trade: Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers' EcoEvoRxiv. <https://ecoevorxiv.org/y6pzk/>

APA

Dang, V. H. N., Nielsen, M. R., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2021). Conserving rhinos by legal trade: Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers. EcoEvoRxiv. EcoEvoRxiv Preprints https://ecoevorxiv.org/y6pzk/

Vancouver

Dang VHN, Nielsen MR, Jacobsen JB. Conserving rhinos by legal trade: Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers. EcoEvoRxiv. 2021.

Author

Dang, Vu Hoai Nam ; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl. / Conserving rhinos by legal trade : Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers. EcoEvoRxiv, 2021. (EcoEvoRxiv Preprints).

Bibtex

@techreport{58911e9980a6412096bcd76e7b15b141,
title = "Conserving rhinos by legal trade: Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers",
abstract = "A legal rhino horn trade is suggested to reduce poaching. To examine this proposition we conducted a choice experiment with 345 rhino horn consumers in Vietnam investigating their preferences for legality, source, price and peer experience of medicinal efficacy as attributes in their decision to purchase rhino horn. We calculated consumers{\textquoteright} willingness to pay for each attribute level. Consumers preferred and were willing to pay more for wild than semi-wild and farmed rhino horn but showed the strongest preference for legal horn although higher-income consumers were less concerned about legality. The number of peers having used rhino horn without positive effect reduced preference for wild-sourced horn and increased preference for legality. Hence, a legal trade in rhino horn would likely not eliminate a parallel black market. Whether poaching would be reduced depends on the price difference in the two markets, campaigns ability to change consumer preferences, and regulation efforts.",
author = "Dang, {Vu Hoai Nam} and Nielsen, {Martin Reinhardt} and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl}",
year = "2021",
language = "English",
series = "EcoEvoRxiv Preprints",
publisher = "EcoEvoRxiv",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "EcoEvoRxiv",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Conserving rhinos by legal trade

T2 - Insights from a choice experiment on rhino horn consumers

AU - Dang, Vu Hoai Nam

AU - Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - A legal rhino horn trade is suggested to reduce poaching. To examine this proposition we conducted a choice experiment with 345 rhino horn consumers in Vietnam investigating their preferences for legality, source, price and peer experience of medicinal efficacy as attributes in their decision to purchase rhino horn. We calculated consumers’ willingness to pay for each attribute level. Consumers preferred and were willing to pay more for wild than semi-wild and farmed rhino horn but showed the strongest preference for legal horn although higher-income consumers were less concerned about legality. The number of peers having used rhino horn without positive effect reduced preference for wild-sourced horn and increased preference for legality. Hence, a legal trade in rhino horn would likely not eliminate a parallel black market. Whether poaching would be reduced depends on the price difference in the two markets, campaigns ability to change consumer preferences, and regulation efforts.

AB - A legal rhino horn trade is suggested to reduce poaching. To examine this proposition we conducted a choice experiment with 345 rhino horn consumers in Vietnam investigating their preferences for legality, source, price and peer experience of medicinal efficacy as attributes in their decision to purchase rhino horn. We calculated consumers’ willingness to pay for each attribute level. Consumers preferred and were willing to pay more for wild than semi-wild and farmed rhino horn but showed the strongest preference for legal horn although higher-income consumers were less concerned about legality. The number of peers having used rhino horn without positive effect reduced preference for wild-sourced horn and increased preference for legality. Hence, a legal trade in rhino horn would likely not eliminate a parallel black market. Whether poaching would be reduced depends on the price difference in the two markets, campaigns ability to change consumer preferences, and regulation efforts.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - EcoEvoRxiv Preprints

BT - Conserving rhinos by legal trade

PB - EcoEvoRxiv

ER -

ID: 273077703