Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy : developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. / Daugbjerg, Carsten; Fawcett, Paul.

I: Administration & Society, Bind 49, Nr. 9, 2017, s. 1223-1245.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Daugbjerg, C & Fawcett, P 2017, 'Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis', Administration & Society, bind 49, nr. 9, s. 1223-1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581031

APA

Daugbjerg, C., & Fawcett, P. (2017). Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. Administration & Society, 49(9), 1223-1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581031

Vancouver

Daugbjerg C, Fawcett P. Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. Administration & Society. 2017;49(9):1223-1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581031

Author

Daugbjerg, Carsten ; Fawcett, Paul. / Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy : developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. I: Administration & Society. 2017 ; Bind 49, Nr. 9. s. 1223-1245.

Bibtex

@article{8879307c07654abb81f770bf8ed386ec,
title = "Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis",
abstract = "This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state{\textquoteright}s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like. ",
author = "Carsten Daugbjerg and Paul Fawcett",
note = "Published online 26 April 2015",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0095399715581031",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1223--1245",
journal = "Administration & Society",
issn = "0095-3997",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy

T2 - developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

AU - Fawcett, Paul

N1 - Published online 26 April 2015

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.

AB - This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.

U2 - 10.1177/0095399715581031

DO - 10.1177/0095399715581031

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 1223

EP - 1245

JO - Administration & Society

JF - Administration & Society

SN - 0095-3997

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 154037632