Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. / Hansen, Teis.

I: Regional Studies, Bind 49, Nr. 10, 10.2015, s. 1672-1684.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, T 2015, 'Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects', Regional Studies, bind 49, nr. 10, s. 1672-1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120

APA

Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672-1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120

Vancouver

Hansen T. Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies. 2015 okt.;49(10):1672-1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120

Author

Hansen, Teis. / Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. I: Regional Studies. 2015 ; Bind 49, Nr. 10. s. 1672-1684.

Bibtex

@article{242a96071a8a459599bb828a5619b64d,
title = "Substitution or Overlap?: The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects",
abstract = "Traditionally, economic geographers stress geographical proximity's positive impact on collaboration processes. However, effects of cognitive, organizational, social and institutional proximity dimensions have been emphasized recently. This paper examines the relations between geography and these non-spatial dimensions by distinguishing two mechanisms: the substitution mechanism, where non-spatial forms of proximity substitute for geographical proximity; and the overlap mechanism, where geographical proximity facilitates non-spatial proximity. The two mechanisms{\textquoteright} importance is analysed in collaborative innovation projects in the Danish cleantech industry. Regression models are complemented by a qualitative analysis of the relationship between the geographical and institutional dimensions.",
keywords = "Cleantech, Collaboration, Innovation, Knowledge linkages, Proximity",
author = "Teis Hansen",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1080/00343404.2013.873120",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1672--1684",
journal = "Regional Studies",
issn = "0034-3404",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substitution or Overlap?

T2 - The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects

AU - Hansen, Teis

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Traditionally, economic geographers stress geographical proximity's positive impact on collaboration processes. However, effects of cognitive, organizational, social and institutional proximity dimensions have been emphasized recently. This paper examines the relations between geography and these non-spatial dimensions by distinguishing two mechanisms: the substitution mechanism, where non-spatial forms of proximity substitute for geographical proximity; and the overlap mechanism, where geographical proximity facilitates non-spatial proximity. The two mechanisms’ importance is analysed in collaborative innovation projects in the Danish cleantech industry. Regression models are complemented by a qualitative analysis of the relationship between the geographical and institutional dimensions.

AB - Traditionally, economic geographers stress geographical proximity's positive impact on collaboration processes. However, effects of cognitive, organizational, social and institutional proximity dimensions have been emphasized recently. This paper examines the relations between geography and these non-spatial dimensions by distinguishing two mechanisms: the substitution mechanism, where non-spatial forms of proximity substitute for geographical proximity; and the overlap mechanism, where geographical proximity facilitates non-spatial proximity. The two mechanisms’ importance is analysed in collaborative innovation projects in the Danish cleantech industry. Regression models are complemented by a qualitative analysis of the relationship between the geographical and institutional dimensions.

KW - Cleantech

KW - Collaboration

KW - Innovation

KW - Knowledge linkages

KW - Proximity

U2 - 10.1080/00343404.2013.873120

DO - 10.1080/00343404.2013.873120

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84939257535

VL - 49

SP - 1672

EP - 1684

JO - Regional Studies

JF - Regional Studies

SN - 0034-3404

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 255104847