The threat of COVID-19 to the conservation of Tanzanian national parks

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,39 MB, PDF-dokument

In many low-income countries, the conservation of natural resources in protected areas relies on tourism revenue. However, tourist numbers in Africa were severely reduced by the COVID-19 pandemic, thus, putting the conservation of these important protected areas at risk. We use records from gate passings at national parks across Tanzania to demonstrate the immediate and severe impact on tourist numbers and revenues resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions, and whether international and local (East African) tourists were affected equally. We discuss mechanisms that may reduce future negative impacts of sudden loss of revenue from international tourism, such as increasing the revenue portfolio and thereby decrease the dependency on revenues from international tourists. More important, we encourage local governments, national park authorities, and the world community to further develop and initiate external funding options to reduce the dependency on income from international nature-based tourism to preserve national parks and biodiversity. An additional long-term goal for ensuring sustained conservation would be to increase benefits to local communities adjacent to national parks, encouraging local involvement and thereby reducing the dependence on external funding in the future.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer110037
TidsskriftBiological Conservation
Vol/bind282
Antal sider6
ISSN0006-3207
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Several Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), including the Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), as well as international organizations such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), have directly supported protected areas. Also, private funds such as the Grumeti Fund and Friedkin Conservation Fund have invested in local development and supported local development in communities surrounding protected areas. Moreover, these private funds may also support other conservation projects, e.g. research and anti-poaching initiatives. However, most conservation funding in East Africa has been governmental ( Lindsey et al., 2018 ). Thus, there is potential for substantial increases in funding from the private sector.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 344795219