Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. / Larsen, Helle Overgaard; Olsen, Carsten Smith.

I: Biodiversity and Conservation, Bind 16, Nr. 6, 2007, s. 1679-1697.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Larsen, HO & Olsen, CS 2007, 'Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation', Biodiversity and Conservation, bind 16, nr. 6, s. 1679-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4

APA

Larsen, H. O., & Olsen, C. S. (2007). Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(6), 1679-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4

Vancouver

Larsen HO, Olsen CS. Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2007;16(6):1679-1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4

Author

Larsen, Helle Overgaard ; Olsen, Carsten Smith. / Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade? uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. I: Biodiversity and Conservation. 2007 ; Bind 16, Nr. 6. s. 1679-1697.

Bibtex

@article{3d2d6c50a1c111ddb6ae000ea68e967b,
title = "Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade?: uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation",
abstract = "Abstract The trade in medicinal plants for herbal remedies is large and probably increasing. The trade has attracted the attention of scientists and development planners interested in the impact on plant populations and the potential to improve rural livelihoods through community based management and conservation. This has resulted in a large number of publications and development activities, ranging from small NGO projects to new government policies. Through a review of 119 references from Nepal, 4 common assumptions regarding the medicinal plant collection and trade have been identified: I. The commercial medicinal plant resource base is becoming ever more degraded as a consequence of collection; II. The medicinal plants are an open-access resource; III. Cultivation can contribute to conservation of commercially collected medicinal plant species; and IV. Medicinal plant harvesters are cheated by middlemen. The frequency of the assumptions is documented, their empirical support is evaluated, and the consequences of their presence for conservation and rural livelihoods are discussed. It is concluded that the empirical backing for the assumptions is weak, and that some reviewed references use logically flawed argumentation. It is argued that the assumptions are leading to misguided conservation efforts, and an inclusive approach to conservation of commercial central Himalayan medicinal plant species is briefly outlined. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4 and is accessible for authorized users.",
author = "Larsen, {Helle Overgaard} and Olsen, {Carsten Smith}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1679--1697",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unsustainable colletion and unfair trade?

T2 - uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation

AU - Larsen, Helle Overgaard

AU - Olsen, Carsten Smith

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Abstract The trade in medicinal plants for herbal remedies is large and probably increasing. The trade has attracted the attention of scientists and development planners interested in the impact on plant populations and the potential to improve rural livelihoods through community based management and conservation. This has resulted in a large number of publications and development activities, ranging from small NGO projects to new government policies. Through a review of 119 references from Nepal, 4 common assumptions regarding the medicinal plant collection and trade have been identified: I. The commercial medicinal plant resource base is becoming ever more degraded as a consequence of collection; II. The medicinal plants are an open-access resource; III. Cultivation can contribute to conservation of commercially collected medicinal plant species; and IV. Medicinal plant harvesters are cheated by middlemen. The frequency of the assumptions is documented, their empirical support is evaluated, and the consequences of their presence for conservation and rural livelihoods are discussed. It is concluded that the empirical backing for the assumptions is weak, and that some reviewed references use logically flawed argumentation. It is argued that the assumptions are leading to misguided conservation efforts, and an inclusive approach to conservation of commercial central Himalayan medicinal plant species is briefly outlined. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

AB - Abstract The trade in medicinal plants for herbal remedies is large and probably increasing. The trade has attracted the attention of scientists and development planners interested in the impact on plant populations and the potential to improve rural livelihoods through community based management and conservation. This has resulted in a large number of publications and development activities, ranging from small NGO projects to new government policies. Through a review of 119 references from Nepal, 4 common assumptions regarding the medicinal plant collection and trade have been identified: I. The commercial medicinal plant resource base is becoming ever more degraded as a consequence of collection; II. The medicinal plants are an open-access resource; III. Cultivation can contribute to conservation of commercially collected medicinal plant species; and IV. Medicinal plant harvesters are cheated by middlemen. The frequency of the assumptions is documented, their empirical support is evaluated, and the consequences of their presence for conservation and rural livelihoods are discussed. It is concluded that the empirical backing for the assumptions is weak, and that some reviewed references use logically flawed argumentation. It is argued that the assumptions are leading to misguided conservation efforts, and an inclusive approach to conservation of commercial central Himalayan medicinal plant species is briefly outlined. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4

DO - 10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 1679

EP - 1697

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 8038401