Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Agricultural nitrate pollution : regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark. / Anker, Helle Tegner.
I: Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, Bind 2015, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 7-23.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Agricultural nitrate pollution
T2 - regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark
AU - Anker, Helle Tegner
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Despite the passing of almost 25 years since the adoption of the EU Nitrates Directive, agriculturalnitrate pollution remains a major concern in most EU Member States. This is also the case in Denmark, although a fairly strict regulatory regime has resulted in almost a 50 per cent reduction innitrogen leaching since the mid-80s. Nevertheless, further effort is needed, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. This article discusses different regulatory approaches – and in particular the need for a differentiated nitrate regulation tailored to meet site-specific ecological demands – from a legal perspective drawing on EU and Danish experiences. It argues that there is a need for a mix of regulatory approaches and instruments taking into account concerns regarding the unequal treatment of farmers and potential interference with private property rights. One option might be a differentiation of the mandatory specification standards of the Nitrates Directive combined with additional instruments to address the need for severe restrictions on fertiliser use or cultivation practices in the most ecologically vulnerable areas.
AB - Despite the passing of almost 25 years since the adoption of the EU Nitrates Directive, agriculturalnitrate pollution remains a major concern in most EU Member States. This is also the case in Denmark, although a fairly strict regulatory regime has resulted in almost a 50 per cent reduction innitrogen leaching since the mid-80s. Nevertheless, further effort is needed, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. This article discusses different regulatory approaches – and in particular the need for a differentiated nitrate regulation tailored to meet site-specific ecological demands – from a legal perspective drawing on EU and Danish experiences. It argues that there is a need for a mix of regulatory approaches and instruments taking into account concerns regarding the unequal treatment of farmers and potential interference with private property rights. One option might be a differentiation of the mandatory specification standards of the Nitrates Directive combined with additional instruments to address the need for severe restrictions on fertiliser use or cultivation practices in the most ecologically vulnerable areas.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 2015
SP - 7
EP - 23
JO - Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift
JF - Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift
SN - 2000-4273
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 153757954