Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Agricultural nitrate pollution : regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark. / Anker, Helle Tegner.

I: Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, Bind 2015, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 7-23.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Anker, HT 2015, 'Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark', Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, bind 2015, nr. 2, s. 7-23. <http://nordiskmiljoratt.se/onewebmedia/NMT_2015-2.pdf>

APA

Anker, H. T. (2015). Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark. Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, 2015(2), 7-23. http://nordiskmiljoratt.se/onewebmedia/NMT_2015-2.pdf

Vancouver

Anker HT. Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark. Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift. 2015;2015(2):7-23.

Author

Anker, Helle Tegner. / Agricultural nitrate pollution : regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark. I: Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift. 2015 ; Bind 2015, Nr. 2. s. 7-23.

Bibtex

@article{933839e97e1a4065ac7e0d20c1567c42,
title = "Agricultural nitrate pollution: regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark",
abstract = "Despite the passing of almost 25 years since the adoption of the EU Nitrates Directive, agriculturalnitrate pollution remains a major concern in most EU Member States. This is also the case in Denmark, although a fairly strict regulatory regime has resulted in almost a 50 per cent reduction innitrogen leaching since the mid-80s. Nevertheless, further effort is needed, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. This article discusses different regulatory approaches – and in particular the need for a differentiated nitrate regulation tailored to meet site-specific ecological demands – from a legal perspective drawing on EU and Danish experiences. It argues that there is a need for a mix of regulatory approaches and instruments taking into account concerns regarding the unequal treatment of farmers and potential interference with private property rights. One option might be a differentiation of the mandatory specification standards of the Nitrates Directive combined with additional instruments to address the need for severe restrictions on fertiliser use or cultivation practices in the most ecologically vulnerable areas.",
author = "Anker, {Helle Tegner}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
pages = "7--23",
journal = "Nordisk Milj{\"o}r{\"a}ttslig Tidskrift",
issn = "2000-4273",
publisher = "Uppsala University",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agricultural nitrate pollution

T2 - regulatory approaches in the EU and Denmark

AU - Anker, Helle Tegner

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Despite the passing of almost 25 years since the adoption of the EU Nitrates Directive, agriculturalnitrate pollution remains a major concern in most EU Member States. This is also the case in Denmark, although a fairly strict regulatory regime has resulted in almost a 50 per cent reduction innitrogen leaching since the mid-80s. Nevertheless, further effort is needed, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. This article discusses different regulatory approaches – and in particular the need for a differentiated nitrate regulation tailored to meet site-specific ecological demands – from a legal perspective drawing on EU and Danish experiences. It argues that there is a need for a mix of regulatory approaches and instruments taking into account concerns regarding the unequal treatment of farmers and potential interference with private property rights. One option might be a differentiation of the mandatory specification standards of the Nitrates Directive combined with additional instruments to address the need for severe restrictions on fertiliser use or cultivation practices in the most ecologically vulnerable areas.

AB - Despite the passing of almost 25 years since the adoption of the EU Nitrates Directive, agriculturalnitrate pollution remains a major concern in most EU Member States. This is also the case in Denmark, although a fairly strict regulatory regime has resulted in almost a 50 per cent reduction innitrogen leaching since the mid-80s. Nevertheless, further effort is needed, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas. This article discusses different regulatory approaches – and in particular the need for a differentiated nitrate regulation tailored to meet site-specific ecological demands – from a legal perspective drawing on EU and Danish experiences. It argues that there is a need for a mix of regulatory approaches and instruments taking into account concerns regarding the unequal treatment of farmers and potential interference with private property rights. One option might be a differentiation of the mandatory specification standards of the Nitrates Directive combined with additional instruments to address the need for severe restrictions on fertiliser use or cultivation practices in the most ecologically vulnerable areas.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2015

SP - 7

EP - 23

JO - Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift

JF - Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift

SN - 2000-4273

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 153757954