Coping with EU environmental legislation: transposition principles and practices

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Coping with EU environmental legislation : transposition principles and practices. / Anker, Helle Tegner; de Graaf, Kars; Purdy, Ray; Squintani, Lorenzo .

I: Journal of Environmental Law, Bind 27, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 17-44.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Anker, HT, de Graaf, K, Purdy, R & Squintani, L 2015, 'Coping with EU environmental legislation: transposition principles and practices', Journal of Environmental Law, bind 27, nr. 1, s. 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/equ033

APA

Anker, H. T., de Graaf, K., Purdy, R., & Squintani, L. (2015). Coping with EU environmental legislation: transposition principles and practices. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(1), 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/equ033

Vancouver

Anker HT, de Graaf K, Purdy R, Squintani L. Coping with EU environmental legislation: transposition principles and practices. Journal of Environmental Law. 2015;27(1):17-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/equ033

Author

Anker, Helle Tegner ; de Graaf, Kars ; Purdy, Ray ; Squintani, Lorenzo . / Coping with EU environmental legislation : transposition principles and practices. I: Journal of Environmental Law. 2015 ; Bind 27, Nr. 1. s. 17-44.

Bibtex

@article{f12be8fa76964ae3b5ab70da13c467b3,
title = "Coping with EU environmental legislation: transposition principles and practices",
abstract = "A {\textquoteleft}burden reducing{\textquoteright} agenda has spurred an increased interest in how EU environmental legislation is transposed into national legislation—most prominently reflected in the principle of {\textquoteleft}no gold-plating{\textquoteright}. Yet, an important question is to what extent transposition principles and practices may ensure a coherent and accessible body of environmental legislation, while at the same time ensuring adequate transposition of EU environmental legislation. This article analyses the existence, or emergence, of transposition principles and practices in three Member States—the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Denmark. It also examines how EU initiatives may influence these principles and practices. The article concludes that the steering of transposition processes by general transposition principles and objectives alone, and in particular those dominated by a {\textquoteleft}burden reducing{\textquoteright} agenda, has a limited focus on coherence and accessibility with respect to environmental legislation and that such issues deserve more attention in the transposition process. ",
author = "Anker, {Helle Tegner} and {de Graaf}, Kars and Ray Purdy and Lorenzo Squintani",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/jel/equ033",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "17--44",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "0952-8873",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping with EU environmental legislation

T2 - transposition principles and practices

AU - Anker, Helle Tegner

AU - de Graaf, Kars

AU - Purdy, Ray

AU - Squintani, Lorenzo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A ‘burden reducing’ agenda has spurred an increased interest in how EU environmental legislation is transposed into national legislation—most prominently reflected in the principle of ‘no gold-plating’. Yet, an important question is to what extent transposition principles and practices may ensure a coherent and accessible body of environmental legislation, while at the same time ensuring adequate transposition of EU environmental legislation. This article analyses the existence, or emergence, of transposition principles and practices in three Member States—the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Denmark. It also examines how EU initiatives may influence these principles and practices. The article concludes that the steering of transposition processes by general transposition principles and objectives alone, and in particular those dominated by a ‘burden reducing’ agenda, has a limited focus on coherence and accessibility with respect to environmental legislation and that such issues deserve more attention in the transposition process.

AB - A ‘burden reducing’ agenda has spurred an increased interest in how EU environmental legislation is transposed into national legislation—most prominently reflected in the principle of ‘no gold-plating’. Yet, an important question is to what extent transposition principles and practices may ensure a coherent and accessible body of environmental legislation, while at the same time ensuring adequate transposition of EU environmental legislation. This article analyses the existence, or emergence, of transposition principles and practices in three Member States—the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Denmark. It also examines how EU initiatives may influence these principles and practices. The article concludes that the steering of transposition processes by general transposition principles and objectives alone, and in particular those dominated by a ‘burden reducing’ agenda, has a limited focus on coherence and accessibility with respect to environmental legislation and that such issues deserve more attention in the transposition process.

U2 - 10.1093/jel/equ033

DO - 10.1093/jel/equ033

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 17

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 0952-8873

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 130479278