Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels. / Dean, Wesley R.; Sharkey, Joseph R.; Nalty, Courtney C.; Xu, Jin.

I: Rural Sociology, Bind 79, Nr. 4, 2014, s. 505-531.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Dean, WR, Sharkey, JR, Nalty, CC & Xu, J 2014, 'Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels', Rural Sociology, bind 79, nr. 4, s. 505-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12047

APA

Dean, W. R., Sharkey, J. R., Nalty, C. C., & Xu, J. (2014). Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels. Rural Sociology, 79(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12047

Vancouver

Dean WR, Sharkey JR, Nalty CC, Xu J. Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels. Rural Sociology. 2014;79(4):505-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12047

Author

Dean, Wesley R. ; Sharkey, Joseph R. ; Nalty, Courtney C. ; Xu, Jin. / Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels. I: Rural Sociology. 2014 ; Bind 79, Nr. 4. s. 505-531.

Bibtex

@article{a57776bedc3744658cc2c2a78b3ebe78,
title = "Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels",
abstract = "Whether government-based forms of food assistance such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), communal efforts including food pantries, aid from friends and family, or alternative means such as gardening are the appropriate means to reduce the prevalence of household food insecurity is a continuous source of policy contention. To inform this debate, we examine the relative importance of these forms of food assistance and acquisition to a sample of U.S. older adults from the 2010 Brazos Valley Health Assessment of central Texas households that have been stratified by income eligibility for SNAP, low-income SNAP ineligibility, and above low income status. To identify how membership in these socioeconomic groups constrains household capacity to acquire sufficient food to maintain an adequate and healthy diet, we explore the varied associations of assets received from government; communal and intimate social networks; and alternative food sources such as gardening, hunting, and fishing with household food security across socioeconomic status, while examining the importance of place of residence on the use of capital assets. SNAP participation was the only specific capital asset associated with all levels of food insecurity for both SNAP-eligible and ineligible low-income groups, thus emphasizing the continued importance of food assistance among poverty-level older adults.",
author = "Dean, {Wesley R.} and Sharkey, {Joseph R.} and Nalty, {Courtney C.} and Jin Xu",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/ruso.12047",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "505--531",
journal = "Rural Sociology",
issn = "0036-0112",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Government capital, intimate and community social capital, and food security status in older adults with different income levels

AU - Dean, Wesley R.

AU - Sharkey, Joseph R.

AU - Nalty, Courtney C.

AU - Xu, Jin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Whether government-based forms of food assistance such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), communal efforts including food pantries, aid from friends and family, or alternative means such as gardening are the appropriate means to reduce the prevalence of household food insecurity is a continuous source of policy contention. To inform this debate, we examine the relative importance of these forms of food assistance and acquisition to a sample of U.S. older adults from the 2010 Brazos Valley Health Assessment of central Texas households that have been stratified by income eligibility for SNAP, low-income SNAP ineligibility, and above low income status. To identify how membership in these socioeconomic groups constrains household capacity to acquire sufficient food to maintain an adequate and healthy diet, we explore the varied associations of assets received from government; communal and intimate social networks; and alternative food sources such as gardening, hunting, and fishing with household food security across socioeconomic status, while examining the importance of place of residence on the use of capital assets. SNAP participation was the only specific capital asset associated with all levels of food insecurity for both SNAP-eligible and ineligible low-income groups, thus emphasizing the continued importance of food assistance among poverty-level older adults.

AB - Whether government-based forms of food assistance such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), communal efforts including food pantries, aid from friends and family, or alternative means such as gardening are the appropriate means to reduce the prevalence of household food insecurity is a continuous source of policy contention. To inform this debate, we examine the relative importance of these forms of food assistance and acquisition to a sample of U.S. older adults from the 2010 Brazos Valley Health Assessment of central Texas households that have been stratified by income eligibility for SNAP, low-income SNAP ineligibility, and above low income status. To identify how membership in these socioeconomic groups constrains household capacity to acquire sufficient food to maintain an adequate and healthy diet, we explore the varied associations of assets received from government; communal and intimate social networks; and alternative food sources such as gardening, hunting, and fishing with household food security across socioeconomic status, while examining the importance of place of residence on the use of capital assets. SNAP participation was the only specific capital asset associated with all levels of food insecurity for both SNAP-eligible and ineligible low-income groups, thus emphasizing the continued importance of food assistance among poverty-level older adults.

U2 - 10.1111/ruso.12047

DO - 10.1111/ruso.12047

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84919841763

VL - 79

SP - 505

EP - 531

JO - Rural Sociology

JF - Rural Sociology

SN - 0036-0112

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 255453714