Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug. / Holm, Sune.

I: Philosophy and Technology, Bind 36, 38, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Holm, S 2023, 'Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug', Philosophy and Technology, bind 36, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8

APA

Holm, S. (2023). Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug. Philosophy and Technology, 36, [38]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8

Vancouver

Holm S. Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug. Philosophy and Technology. 2023;36. 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8

Author

Holm, Sune. / Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data? A comment on Ploug. I: Philosophy and Technology. 2023 ; Bind 36.

Bibtex

@article{b724e159bb2e41299b421eb01edf664e,
title = "Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data?: A comment on Ploug",
abstract = "Several studies have documented that when presented with data from social media platforms machine learning (ML) models can make accurate predictions about users, e.g., about whether they are likely to suffer health-related conditions such as depression, mental disorders, and risk of suicide. In a recent article, Ploug (Philos Technol 36:14, 2023) defends a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data. In this comment, I raise some questions in relation to Ploug{\textquoteright}s argument that I think deserves further discussion.",
keywords = "AI profiling, Privacy, Public data, Rights",
author = "Sune Holm",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Philosophy and Technology",
issn = "2210-5433",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should people have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data?

T2 - A comment on Ploug

AU - Holm, Sune

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Several studies have documented that when presented with data from social media platforms machine learning (ML) models can make accurate predictions about users, e.g., about whether they are likely to suffer health-related conditions such as depression, mental disorders, and risk of suicide. In a recent article, Ploug (Philos Technol 36:14, 2023) defends a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data. In this comment, I raise some questions in relation to Ploug’s argument that I think deserves further discussion.

AB - Several studies have documented that when presented with data from social media platforms machine learning (ML) models can make accurate predictions about users, e.g., about whether they are likely to suffer health-related conditions such as depression, mental disorders, and risk of suicide. In a recent article, Ploug (Philos Technol 36:14, 2023) defends a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data. In this comment, I raise some questions in relation to Ploug’s argument that I think deserves further discussion.

KW - AI profiling

KW - Privacy

KW - Public data

KW - Rights

U2 - 10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8

DO - 10.1007/s13347-023-00641-8

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85160035914

VL - 36

JO - Philosophy and Technology

JF - Philosophy and Technology

SN - 2210-5433

M1 - 38

ER -

ID: 352969905