Teleology and Biocentrism

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Teleology and Biocentrism. / Holm, Sune Hannibal.

I: Synthese, Bind 194, Nr. 4, 2017, s. 1075-1087.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Holm, SH 2017, 'Teleology and Biocentrism', Synthese, bind 194, nr. 4, s. 1075-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0

APA

Holm, S. H. (2017). Teleology and Biocentrism. Synthese, 194(4), 1075-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0

Vancouver

Holm SH. Teleology and Biocentrism. Synthese. 2017;194(4):1075-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0

Author

Holm, Sune Hannibal. / Teleology and Biocentrism. I: Synthese. 2017 ; Bind 194, Nr. 4. s. 1075-1087.

Bibtex

@article{a1ed8aa0040a472c96083a0dba1b64cf,
title = "Teleology and Biocentrism",
abstract = "In this paper I examine the connection between accounts of biological teleology and the biocentrist claim that all living beings have a good of their own. I first present the background for biocentrists{\textquoteright} appeal to biological teleology. Then I raise a problem of scope for teleology-based biocentrism and, drawing in part on recent work by Basl and Sandler, I discuss Taylor and Varner{\textquoteright}s responses to this problem. I then challenge Basl and Sandler{\textquoteright}s own response to the scope problem for its reliance on a selectionist account of organismic teleology. Finally I examine the prospects for a biocentrist response to the problem of scope based on an alternative organisational account of internal teleology. I conclude by assessing the prospects for teleology-based biocentrism.",
author = "Holm, {Sune Hannibal}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0",
language = "English",
volume = "194",
pages = "1075--1087",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teleology and Biocentrism

AU - Holm, Sune Hannibal

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this paper I examine the connection between accounts of biological teleology and the biocentrist claim that all living beings have a good of their own. I first present the background for biocentrists’ appeal to biological teleology. Then I raise a problem of scope for teleology-based biocentrism and, drawing in part on recent work by Basl and Sandler, I discuss Taylor and Varner’s responses to this problem. I then challenge Basl and Sandler’s own response to the scope problem for its reliance on a selectionist account of organismic teleology. Finally I examine the prospects for a biocentrist response to the problem of scope based on an alternative organisational account of internal teleology. I conclude by assessing the prospects for teleology-based biocentrism.

AB - In this paper I examine the connection between accounts of biological teleology and the biocentrist claim that all living beings have a good of their own. I first present the background for biocentrists’ appeal to biological teleology. Then I raise a problem of scope for teleology-based biocentrism and, drawing in part on recent work by Basl and Sandler, I discuss Taylor and Varner’s responses to this problem. I then challenge Basl and Sandler’s own response to the scope problem for its reliance on a selectionist account of organismic teleology. Finally I examine the prospects for a biocentrist response to the problem of scope based on an alternative organisational account of internal teleology. I conclude by assessing the prospects for teleology-based biocentrism.

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0

DO - 10.1007/s11229-016-1300-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 194

SP - 1075

EP - 1087

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 169759765