Silvicultural madness: A case from the “Scientific Forestry Initiatives” in the Community Forests of Nepal
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Silvicultural madness : A case from the “Scientific Forestry Initiatives” in the Community Forests of Nepal. / Basnyat, Bijendra; Treue, Thorsten; Pokharel, R.K.
I: Banko Janakari, Nr. Special Issue 4, 2018, s. 54-64.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Silvicultural madness
T2 - A case from the “Scientific Forestry Initiatives” in the Community Forests of Nepal
AU - Basnyat, Bijendra
AU - Treue, Thorsten
AU - Pokharel, R.K.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Following a case study approach, this paper explains how scientific forest management plans were developed and implemented in community forests of a mid-hill district in Nepal. Field observations were carried over a period of two years (December 2014 to December 2016) in two community forests. User group members, forest officials, forest technicians and executive committeemembers were consulted. The plans were prepared simply by compiling the administrative requirements where management prescriptions were defined either based on forest technicians‘ knowledge or taken directly from the government guidelines with little reference to the actual site quality, management objectives, and forest stand conditions. Apart from harvesting of trees, usershardly implemented the plans‘ silvicultural prescriptions and forest restoration activities. Moreover forest officials administratively reduced the number of trees that users could harvest to around half of what the plans allow. Accordingly, forest user groups face a paradoxical forest administration that promotes timber harvesting according to so-called scientific principles, which it then brushes aside to satisfy bureaucratic demands. The study concludes that the concept of scientific forestry is merely used as a "brand" or a seemingly sound "narrative" in community forestry,while it is of little practical relevance because administrative decisions are more powerful in guiding forest management decisions. Hence, the study suggests a replacement of the current schizophrenic mix of so-called"scientific forest management" and sweeping administrative orders with adaptive management practices in community forests.
AB - Following a case study approach, this paper explains how scientific forest management plans were developed and implemented in community forests of a mid-hill district in Nepal. Field observations were carried over a period of two years (December 2014 to December 2016) in two community forests. User group members, forest officials, forest technicians and executive committeemembers were consulted. The plans were prepared simply by compiling the administrative requirements where management prescriptions were defined either based on forest technicians‘ knowledge or taken directly from the government guidelines with little reference to the actual site quality, management objectives, and forest stand conditions. Apart from harvesting of trees, usershardly implemented the plans‘ silvicultural prescriptions and forest restoration activities. Moreover forest officials administratively reduced the number of trees that users could harvest to around half of what the plans allow. Accordingly, forest user groups face a paradoxical forest administration that promotes timber harvesting according to so-called scientific principles, which it then brushes aside to satisfy bureaucratic demands. The study concludes that the concept of scientific forestry is merely used as a "brand" or a seemingly sound "narrative" in community forestry,while it is of little practical relevance because administrative decisions are more powerful in guiding forest management decisions. Hence, the study suggests a replacement of the current schizophrenic mix of so-called"scientific forest management" and sweeping administrative orders with adaptive management practices in community forests.
M3 - Journal article
SP - 54
EP - 64
JO - Banko Janakari
JF - Banko Janakari
SN - 1016-0582
IS - Special Issue 4
ER -
ID: 194743904