Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry: state-of-the-art and future directions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry : state-of-the-art and future directions. / Strange, Niels; Bogetoft, Peter; Aalmo, Giovanna Ottaviani; Talbot, Bruce; Holt, Anders Holm; Astrup, Rasmus.

I: International Journal of Forest Engineering, Bind 32, Nr. Sup. 1, 2021, s. 87-96.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Strange, N, Bogetoft, P, Aalmo, GO, Talbot, B, Holt, AH & Astrup, R 2021, 'Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry: state-of-the-art and future directions', International Journal of Forest Engineering, bind 32, nr. Sup. 1, s. 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809

APA

Strange, N., Bogetoft, P., Aalmo, G. O., Talbot, B., Holt, A. H., & Astrup, R. (2021). Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry: state-of-the-art and future directions. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 32(Sup. 1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809

Vancouver

Strange N, Bogetoft P, Aalmo GO, Talbot B, Holt AH, Astrup R. Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry: state-of-the-art and future directions. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 2021;32(Sup. 1):87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809

Author

Strange, Niels ; Bogetoft, Peter ; Aalmo, Giovanna Ottaviani ; Talbot, Bruce ; Holt, Anders Holm ; Astrup, Rasmus. / Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry : state-of-the-art and future directions. I: International Journal of Forest Engineering. 2021 ; Bind 32, Nr. Sup. 1. s. 87-96.

Bibtex

@article{f738d73af49f4659b2f61c7e0029023b,
title = "Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry: state-of-the-art and future directions",
abstract = "The forestry sector is constantly looking for ways for making data-driven decisions and improving efficiency. The application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) allow the users to go beyond looking at simple key performance indicators. Benchmarking is one of the most common tools in business for improving efficiency and competitiveness. This study searched for benchmarking studies in Web of Science until December 2020. It reviewed 56 benchmarking studies in forestry and discusses the potential advantages of using benchmarking in forestry. More than 80% of the studies apply DEA. This review found that almost half of the benchmarking studies in forestry have attempted to estimate the efficiency of forest management organizations at regional scale, mostly being public or state-owned forest districts. A bit more than one-third of the studies have focused on benchmarking forest industries and one-fifth, benchmarking of forest operations. Forest management organizations mainly applied benchmarking for internal comparison and forest industries entirely focused on competitive benchmarking. Surprisingly, in most cases the studies do not necessarily overlap geographically with forest rich countries (e.g., Russian Federation or Brazil). A number of studies address multiple criteria. The future potential for applying automatic data transfer from harvest machines to interactive benchmarking systems are discussed. Finally, the paper discusses the advantages and weaknesses of benchmarking and future research on improving usefulness and usability of benchmarking in forest businesses.",
keywords = "Data envelopment analysis, efficiency, forestry sector, interactive benchmarking, stochastic frontier analysis, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX, PRIMARY WOOD PRODUCERS, TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY, OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY, PERFORMANCE, INDUSTRY, GROWTH, MODEL, SECTOR",
author = "Niels Strange and Peter Bogetoft and Aalmo, {Giovanna Ottaviani} and Bruce Talbot and Holt, {Anders Holm} and Rasmus Astrup",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "87--96",
journal = "International Journal of Forest Engineering",
issn = "1494-2119",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "Sup. 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applications of DEA and SFA in benchmarking studies in forestry

T2 - state-of-the-art and future directions

AU - Strange, Niels

AU - Bogetoft, Peter

AU - Aalmo, Giovanna Ottaviani

AU - Talbot, Bruce

AU - Holt, Anders Holm

AU - Astrup, Rasmus

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The forestry sector is constantly looking for ways for making data-driven decisions and improving efficiency. The application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) allow the users to go beyond looking at simple key performance indicators. Benchmarking is one of the most common tools in business for improving efficiency and competitiveness. This study searched for benchmarking studies in Web of Science until December 2020. It reviewed 56 benchmarking studies in forestry and discusses the potential advantages of using benchmarking in forestry. More than 80% of the studies apply DEA. This review found that almost half of the benchmarking studies in forestry have attempted to estimate the efficiency of forest management organizations at regional scale, mostly being public or state-owned forest districts. A bit more than one-third of the studies have focused on benchmarking forest industries and one-fifth, benchmarking of forest operations. Forest management organizations mainly applied benchmarking for internal comparison and forest industries entirely focused on competitive benchmarking. Surprisingly, in most cases the studies do not necessarily overlap geographically with forest rich countries (e.g., Russian Federation or Brazil). A number of studies address multiple criteria. The future potential for applying automatic data transfer from harvest machines to interactive benchmarking systems are discussed. Finally, the paper discusses the advantages and weaknesses of benchmarking and future research on improving usefulness and usability of benchmarking in forest businesses.

AB - The forestry sector is constantly looking for ways for making data-driven decisions and improving efficiency. The application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) allow the users to go beyond looking at simple key performance indicators. Benchmarking is one of the most common tools in business for improving efficiency and competitiveness. This study searched for benchmarking studies in Web of Science until December 2020. It reviewed 56 benchmarking studies in forestry and discusses the potential advantages of using benchmarking in forestry. More than 80% of the studies apply DEA. This review found that almost half of the benchmarking studies in forestry have attempted to estimate the efficiency of forest management organizations at regional scale, mostly being public or state-owned forest districts. A bit more than one-third of the studies have focused on benchmarking forest industries and one-fifth, benchmarking of forest operations. Forest management organizations mainly applied benchmarking for internal comparison and forest industries entirely focused on competitive benchmarking. Surprisingly, in most cases the studies do not necessarily overlap geographically with forest rich countries (e.g., Russian Federation or Brazil). A number of studies address multiple criteria. The future potential for applying automatic data transfer from harvest machines to interactive benchmarking systems are discussed. Finally, the paper discusses the advantages and weaknesses of benchmarking and future research on improving usefulness and usability of benchmarking in forest businesses.

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - efficiency

KW - forestry sector

KW - interactive benchmarking

KW - stochastic frontier analysis

KW - DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

KW - MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX

KW - PRIMARY WOOD PRODUCERS

KW - TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY

KW - OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - INDUSTRY

KW - GROWTH

KW - MODEL

KW - SECTOR

U2 - 10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809

DO - 10.1080/14942119.2021.1914809

M3 - Review

VL - 32

SP - 87

EP - 96

JO - International Journal of Forest Engineering

JF - International Journal of Forest Engineering

SN - 1494-2119

IS - Sup. 1

ER -

ID: 272072941