Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking : Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers. / Höhler, Julia; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús; Czajkowski, Mikołaj; Dessart, François J.; Ferraro, Paul J.; Li, Tongzhe; Messer, Kent D.; Palm-Forster, Leah; Termansen, Mette; Thomas, Fabian; Zagórska, Katarzyna; Zemo, Kahsay Haile; Rommel, Jens.
I: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Bind 46, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 338-359.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking
T2 - Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers
AU - Höhler, Julia
AU - Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús
AU - Czajkowski, Mikołaj
AU - Dessart, François J.
AU - Ferraro, Paul J.
AU - Li, Tongzhe
AU - Messer, Kent D.
AU - Palm-Forster, Leah
AU - Termansen, Mette
AU - Thomas, Fabian
AU - Zagórska, Katarzyna
AU - Zemo, Kahsay Haile
AU - Rommel, Jens
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.
AB - Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.
KW - agricultural policy
KW - agriculture
KW - behavioral economics
KW - experimental economics
KW - participatory research
KW - INVOLVEMENT
KW - CHALLENGES
U2 - 10.1002/aepp.13385
DO - 10.1002/aepp.13385
M3 - Journal article
VL - 46
SP - 338
EP - 359
JO - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
JF - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
SN - 2040-5790
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 348165558