Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking : Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers. / Höhler, Julia; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús; Czajkowski, Mikołaj; Dessart, François J.; Ferraro, Paul J.; Li, Tongzhe; Messer, Kent D.; Palm-Forster, Leah; Termansen, Mette; Thomas, Fabian; Zagórska, Katarzyna; Zemo, Kahsay Haile; Rommel, Jens.

I: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Bind 46, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 338-359.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Höhler, J, Barreiro-Hurlé, J, Czajkowski, M, Dessart, FJ, Ferraro, PJ, Li, T, Messer, KD, Palm-Forster, L, Termansen, M, Thomas, F, Zagórska, K, Zemo, KH & Rommel, J 2024, 'Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers', Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, bind 46, nr. 1, s. 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13385

APA

Höhler, J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Czajkowski, M., Dessart, F. J., Ferraro, P. J., Li, T., Messer, K. D., Palm-Forster, L., Termansen, M., Thomas, F., Zagórska, K., Zemo, K. H., & Rommel, J. (2024). Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 46(1), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13385

Vancouver

Höhler J, Barreiro-Hurlé J, Czajkowski M, Dessart FJ, Ferraro PJ, Li T o.a. Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2024;46(1):338-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13385

Author

Höhler, Julia ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Czajkowski, Mikołaj ; Dessart, François J. ; Ferraro, Paul J. ; Li, Tongzhe ; Messer, Kent D. ; Palm-Forster, Leah ; Termansen, Mette ; Thomas, Fabian ; Zagórska, Katarzyna ; Zemo, Kahsay Haile ; Rommel, Jens. / Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking : Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers. I: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2024 ; Bind 46, Nr. 1. s. 338-359.

Bibtex

@article{a091eec9d3dd44d28dd17a4b26652e21,
title = "Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers",
abstract = "Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.",
keywords = "agricultural policy, agriculture, behavioral economics, experimental economics, participatory research, INVOLVEMENT, CHALLENGES",
author = "Julia H{\"o}hler and Jes{\'u}s Barreiro-Hurl{\'e} and Miko{\l}aj Czajkowski and Dessart, {Fran{\c c}ois J.} and Ferraro, {Paul J.} and Tongzhe Li and Messer, {Kent D.} and Leah Palm-Forster and Mette Termansen and Fabian Thomas and Katarzyna Zag{\'o}rska and Zemo, {Kahsay Haile} and Jens Rommel",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1002/aepp.13385",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "338--359",
journal = "Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy",
issn = "2040-5790",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking

T2 - Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers

AU - Höhler, Julia

AU - Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús

AU - Czajkowski, Mikołaj

AU - Dessart, François J.

AU - Ferraro, Paul J.

AU - Li, Tongzhe

AU - Messer, Kent D.

AU - Palm-Forster, Leah

AU - Termansen, Mette

AU - Thomas, Fabian

AU - Zagórska, Katarzyna

AU - Zemo, Kahsay Haile

AU - Rommel, Jens

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.

AB - Economic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence-based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.

KW - agricultural policy

KW - agriculture

KW - behavioral economics

KW - experimental economics

KW - participatory research

KW - INVOLVEMENT

KW - CHALLENGES

U2 - 10.1002/aepp.13385

DO - 10.1002/aepp.13385

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 338

EP - 359

JO - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

JF - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

SN - 2040-5790

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 348165558