De-institutionalising governance? Instrument diversity and feedback dynamics
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
De-institutionalising governance? Instrument diversity and feedback dynamics. / Kay, Adrian; Daugbjerg, Carsten.
I: Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Bind 37, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 236-246.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - De-institutionalising governance? Instrument diversity and feedback dynamics
AU - Kay, Adrian
AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Despite several generations of literature on governance and the instruments involved, micro-foundational frameworks remain lacking to describe and model the positive, negative and confused feedback dynamics within any set of governance arrangements. In response, this article addresses the argument common in various historical accounts of a shift from government to governance that governance is a process of deinstitutionalisation. In doing so, governance is revealed not as the simple absence of institutions, but rather as a shift in the nature, composition and diversity of institutions and the instruments adopted by them. This raises important questions about the design and use of instruments and their institutional effects and legitimacy as micro-foundations of governance, and also about the ability of governments to control them given the nature and significance of feedback dynamics.
AB - Despite several generations of literature on governance and the instruments involved, micro-foundational frameworks remain lacking to describe and model the positive, negative and confused feedback dynamics within any set of governance arrangements. In response, this article addresses the argument common in various historical accounts of a shift from government to governance that governance is a process of deinstitutionalisation. In doing so, governance is revealed not as the simple absence of institutions, but rather as a shift in the nature, composition and diversity of institutions and the instruments adopted by them. This raises important questions about the design and use of instruments and their institutional effects and legitimacy as micro-foundations of governance, and also about the ability of governments to control them given the nature and significance of feedback dynamics.
U2 - 10.1080/23276665.2015.1117176
DO - 10.1080/23276665.2015.1117176
M3 - Journal article
VL - 37
SP - 236
EP - 246
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration
SN - 2327-6665
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 154002703