Identity as constraint and resource in interest group evolution: a case of radical organizational change
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Identity as constraint and resource in interest group evolution : a case of radical organizational change. / Halpin, Darren; Daugbjerg, Carsten.
I: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Bind 17, Nr. 1, 01.02.2015, s. 31–48.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Identity as constraint and resource in interest group evolution
T2 - a case of radical organizational change
AU - Halpin, Darren
AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten
N1 - Published online 15 April 2013
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - •demonstrates that the tools of Historical Institutionalism are valuable for interest group scholars in assessing change•offers a way to conceptualize and empirically differentiate between radical and routine change within interest group organisations•shows that a group's founding mission is both a constraint and a resource for radical group change.While group scholars have long noted instances of change in overall organisational form—say from amateur scientific group to environmental campaign group—the literature is short on persuasive accounts of the mechanism(s) that drive or constrain such radical types of change. How can we explain groups getting from form A to form B? In this article we explore how tools from the historical institutionalism literature might aid in the analytical process. Specifically we focus on the combination of focussing events, internal challengers to the status quo, and the capability of challengers to demonstrate to key audiences that the ‘radical’ change is in some way consistent with the founding identity of the group. We demonstrate the application of this approach by examining a case of radical change—a shift in overall form—in a well-known UK interest group, the Soil Association.
AB - •demonstrates that the tools of Historical Institutionalism are valuable for interest group scholars in assessing change•offers a way to conceptualize and empirically differentiate between radical and routine change within interest group organisations•shows that a group's founding mission is both a constraint and a resource for radical group change.While group scholars have long noted instances of change in overall organisational form—say from amateur scientific group to environmental campaign group—the literature is short on persuasive accounts of the mechanism(s) that drive or constrain such radical types of change. How can we explain groups getting from form A to form B? In this article we explore how tools from the historical institutionalism literature might aid in the analytical process. Specifically we focus on the combination of focussing events, internal challengers to the status quo, and the capability of challengers to demonstrate to key audiences that the ‘radical’ change is in some way consistent with the founding identity of the group. We demonstrate the application of this approach by examining a case of radical change—a shift in overall form—in a well-known UK interest group, the Soil Association.
U2 - 10.1111/1467-856X.12016
DO - 10.1111/1467-856X.12016
M3 - Journal article
VL - 17
SP - 31
EP - 48
JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
SN - 1369-1481
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 112939103