Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice. / Schaafsma, M; Ahn, S; Castro, AJ; Dendoncker, N; Filyushkina, A; González-Jiménez, D; Huambachano, Mariaelena; Mukherjee, N; Mwampamba, TH; Ngouhouo-Poufoun, J; Palomo, I; Pandit, R; Termansen, M; Ghazi, H; Jacobs, S; Lee, H; Contreras, V.
I: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Bind 64, 101350, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice
AU - Schaafsma, M
AU - Ahn, S
AU - Castro, AJ
AU - Dendoncker, N
AU - Filyushkina, A
AU - González-Jiménez, D
AU - Huambachano, Mariaelena
AU - Mukherjee, N
AU - Mwampamba, TH
AU - Ngouhouo-Poufoun, J
AU - Palomo, I
AU - Pandit, R
AU - Termansen, M
AU - Ghazi, H
AU - Jacobs, S
AU - Lee, H
AU - Contreras, V
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies according to environmental justice criteria. The results suggest that although diverse value types and indicators are assessed across studies, few individual studies are plural, and studies fail to provide evidence on distributive justice and score low on procedural justice indicators. We provide a set of recommendations for incorporating issues of justice in the design of valuation studies.
AB - The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies according to environmental justice criteria. The results suggest that although diverse value types and indicators are assessed across studies, few individual studies are plural, and studies fail to provide evidence on distributive justice and score low on procedural justice indicators. We provide a set of recommendations for incorporating issues of justice in the design of valuation studies.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101350
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101350
M3 - Journal article
VL - 64
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
SN - 1877-3435
M1 - 101350
ER -
ID: 367907335