Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,55 MB, PDF-dokument

  • M Schaafsma
  • S Ahn
  • AJ Castro
  • N Dendoncker
  • A Filyushkina
  • D González-Jiménez
  • Mariaelena Huambachano
  • N Mukherjee
  • TH Mwampamba
  • J Ngouhouo-Poufoun
  • I Palomo
  • R Pandit
  • Termansen, Mette
  • H Ghazi
  • S Jacobs
  • H Lee
  • V Contreras
The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies according to environmental justice criteria. The results suggest that although diverse value types and indicators are assessed across studies, few individual studies are plural, and studies fail to provide evidence on distributive justice and score low on procedural justice indicators. We provide a set of recommendations for incorporating issues of justice in the design of valuation studies.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer101350
TidsskriftCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Vol/bind64
Antal sider12
ISSN1877-3435
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 367907335